Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley values

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.10464 v3 pith:HH6ICZ4N submitted 2019-03-25 stat.ML cs.LGstat.ME

classification stat.MLcs.LGstat.ME
keywords shapleyvaluesdependentfeaturesindividuallearningmethodmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Explaining complex or seemingly simple machine learning models is an important practical problem. We want to explain individual predictions from a complex machine learning model by learning simple, interpretable explanations. Shapley values is a game theoretic concept that can be used for this purpose. The Shapley value framework has a series of desirable theoretical properties, and can in principle handle any predictive model. Kernel SHAP is a computationally efficient approximation to Shapley values in higher dimensions. Like several other existing methods, this approach assumes that the features are independent, which may give very wrong explanations. This is the case even if a simple linear model is used for predictions. In this paper, we extend the Kernel SHAP method to handle dependent features. We provide several examples of linear and non-linear models with various degrees of feature dependence, where our method gives more accurate approximations to the true Shapley values. We also propose a method for aggregating individual Shapley values, such that the prediction can be explained by groups of dependent variables.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The many Shapley values for model explanation

    cs.AI 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper demonstrates that Shapley-based feature attributions are non-unique, exposes flaws in conditional-expectation Shapley, and provides a uniqueness result for Baseline Shapley.

  2. Shapley Decomposition of R-Squared in Machine Learning Models

    stat.ME 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Shapley-value based normalization of residual variance increases yields feature-level R2 shares that sum to the model's overall R2.

  3. Deep neural network or dermatologist?

    cs.LG 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Convolutional networks trained on dermoscopic images can be accurate yet rely on spurious cues such as dark image corners, and models with equal accuracy can produce very different explanations.

  4. ShaTS: A Shapley-based Explainability Method for Time Series Artificial Intelligence Models applied to Anomaly Detection in Industrial Internet of Things

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    ShaTS computes Shapley attributions directly on semantic groups of time-series features, improving sensor- and process-level anomaly explanations over post hoc SHAP on the SWaT dataset.

Pith tools