Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

(In)Stability for the Blockchain: Deleveraging Spirals and Stablecoin Attacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.02152 v3 pith:J3OBUOII submitted 2019-06-05 q-fin.TR cs.CR

(In)Stability for the Blockchain: Deleveraging Spirals and Stablecoin Attacks

classification q-fin.TR cs.CR
keywords attacksblockchaindeleveragingduringstabilitystablestablecoinblack
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We develop a model of stable assets, including non-custodial stablecoins backed by cryptocurrencies. Such stablecoins are popular methods for bootstrapping price stability within public blockchain settings. We derive fundamental results about dynamics and liquidity in stablecoin markets, demonstrate that these markets face deleveraging feedback effects that cause illiquidity during crises and exacerbate collateral drawdown, and characterize stable dynamics of the system under particular conditions. The possibility of such `deleveraging spirals' was first predicted in the initial release of our paper in 2019 and later directly observed during the `Black Thursday' crisis in Dai in 2020. From these insights, we suggest design improvements that aim to improve long-term stability. We also introduce new attacks that exploit arbitrage-like opportunities around stablecoin liquidations. Using our model, we demonstrate that these can be profitable. These attacks may induce volatility in the `stable' asset and cause perverse incentives for miners, posing risks to blockchain consensus. A variant of such attacks also later occurred during Black Thursday, taking the form of mempool manipulation to clear Dai liquidation auctions at near zero prices, costing $8m.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fair on the Surface: Transaction-Ordering Bias and MEV in Mysticeti DAG-based BFT Protocol

    cs.DC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    In Sui's Mysticeti, same-round blocks are sorted by validator index, giving lower-indexed validators a measurable ordering head start that survives the gas-price re-sort on tied fees, and 'staying silent' can push it ...