REVIEW 1 cited by
Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blame
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blame
read the original abstract
Explanation methods aim to make neural networks more trustworthy and interpretable. In this paper, we demonstrate a property of explanation methods which is disconcerting for both of these purposes. Namely, we show that explanations can be manipulated arbitrarily by applying visually hardly perceptible perturbations to the input that keep the network's output approximately constant. We establish theoretically that this phenomenon can be related to certain geometrical properties of neural networks. This allows us to derive an upper bound on the susceptibility of explanations to manipulations. Based on this result, we propose effective mechanisms to enhance the robustness of explanations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Activation-Deactivation: A General Framework for Robust Post-hoc Explainable AI
ConvAD replaces input occlusion in post-hoc explanation with neuron deactivation in a CNN forward pass, yielding more robust causal explanations with no retraining.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.