Large-scale 3D point cloud representations via graph inception networks with applications to autonomous driving

Baoan Liu; Siheng Chen; Sufeng. Niu; Tian Lan

arxiv: 1906.11359 · v1 · pith:BMHOMTNOnew · submitted 2019-06-26 · 📡 eess.SP · cs.CV· eess.IV

Large-scale 3D point cloud representations via graph inception networks with applications to autonomous driving

Siheng Chen , Sufeng. Niu , Tian Lan , Baoan Liu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 14:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP cs.CVeess.IV

keywords graph neural networkspoint cloud representationautonomous drivingLiDARvoxelization3D point cloudsinception networks

0 comments

The pith

The point cloud neural transform uses graph inception networks inside voxels to represent large-scale 3D point clouds for autonomous driving.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes combining voxelization of 3D space with graph inception networks applied to points inside each voxel. This hybrid approach is intended to capture local structures without the discretization errors of pure voxel methods or the scaling problems of pure learning methods on large scenes. The resulting point cloud neural transform (PCT) is presented as analogous to the blocked discrete cosine transform for images. When tested on real-time LiDAR sweeps from self-driving cars, the PCT using graph inception networks is claimed to outperform prior methods.

Core claim

The point cloud neural transform (PCT) discretizes 3D space into voxels and deploys novel graph inception networks to represent the points within each voxel. This design lets the system avoid discretization errors while handling large-scale scenarios. Applied to real-time LiDAR sweeps produced by self-driving cars, the PCT with graph inception networks significantly outperforms its competitors.

What carries the argument

The point cloud neural transform (PCT), which discretizes 3D space into voxels and applies graph inception networks to represent points inside each voxel.

If this is right

The PCT scales to large scenarios while avoiding the errors of pure voxelization.
The PCT works for representing real-time LiDAR sweeps from self-driving cars.
The PCT with graph inception networks outperforms competing representation methods on this task.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same voxel-plus-graph-inception structure might apply to other dense 3D sensor data such as depth camera outputs.
Downstream tasks like object detection or scene segmentation in autonomous driving could directly use the PCT output as input features.
The blocked-transform analogy suggests the method could be adapted to other domains where local graph structures need to be encoded at multiple scales.

Load-bearing premise

That discretizing 3D space into voxels and applying graph inception networks inside each voxel simultaneously avoids discretization errors and scales to large scenarios without the limitations of pure voxelization or pure learning methods.

What would settle it

A head-to-head test on a large LiDAR dataset from autonomous driving where the PCT with graph inception networks fails to show significant outperformance over the compared methods.

read the original abstract

We present a novel graph-neural-network-based system to effectively represent large-scale 3D point clouds with the applications to autonomous driving. Many previous works studied the representations of 3D point clouds based on two approaches, voxelization, which causes discretization errors and learning, which is hard to capture huge variations in large-scale scenarios. In this work, we combine voxelization and learning: we discretize the 3D space into voxels and propose novel graph inception networks to represent 3D points in each voxel. This combination makes the system avoid discretization errors and work for large-scale scenarios. The entire system for large-scale 3D point clouds acts like the blocked discrete cosine transform for 2D images; we thus call it the point cloud neural transform (PCT). We further apply the proposed PCT to represent real-time LiDAR sweeps produced by self-driving cars and the PCT with graph inception networks significantly outperforms its competitors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The hybrid voxel-plus-graph-inception approach for large LiDAR point clouds is a reasonable engineering idea but the abstract supplies zero metrics or proof that discretization error is actually removed.

read the letter

The paper introduces point cloud neural transform (PCT) that splits 3D space into voxels and runs graph inception networks inside each voxel to represent large point clouds, mainly for autonomous driving LiDAR. It claims the hybrid sidesteps discretization errors from pure voxelization and scaling problems from pure learning methods, and that it significantly outperforms competitors on real-time sweeps from self-driving cars. The blocked-DCT analogy is a clean way to describe local processing across a big scene. That framing and the focus on a practical AV use case are the clearest contributions visible here. The graph inception networks inside voxels could be a useful architectural choice if the details hold up. The main problem is that none of the performance claims are supported by numbers, baselines, datasets, ablations, or error bars in the abstract. The assertion that the method avoids discretization errors also looks shaky on its face. Fixed voxels still map continuous coordinates to a grid; without shown invariance to voxel origin or continuity when points cross boundaries, quantization error remains. The stress-test note is on target. This work targets people building real-time 3D perception stacks for vehicles. A reader already working on graph networks for point clouds might extract the architecture details, but the lack of evidence makes it hard to judge impact. It deserves a serious referee because the application area matters and the hybrid direction is worth testing, even if the abstract is thin. Send it to review so the experiments and boundary handling can be checked properly.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes the Point Cloud Neural Transform (PCT), a hybrid system that discretizes 3D space into voxels and applies novel graph inception networks within each voxel to represent large-scale point clouds. It claims this avoids discretization errors of pure voxelization while scaling better than pure learning methods for large scenarios, drawing an analogy to blocked DCT for images, and reports that PCT with graph inception networks significantly outperforms competitors on real-time LiDAR sweeps for autonomous driving.

Significance. If the outperformance claims are supported by rigorous, reproducible experiments with baselines and ablations, the hybrid voxel-plus-graph approach could provide a useful bridge between discretization-based and learning-based point cloud methods, with potential impact on real-time perception in autonomous driving.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: The claim that discretizing into voxels and then applying graph inception networks 'makes the system avoid discretization errors' is load-bearing for both the novelty argument and the reported outperformance, yet no supporting analysis, invariance proof, or boundary-crossing experiment is referenced. Fixed voxel partitioning inherently quantizes continuous 3D coordinates; without demonstrated continuity or invariance to voxel origin when points cross faces, residual quantization error remains, consistent with the stress-test concern.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract asserts outperformance but supplies no metrics, baselines, dataset details, error bars, or ablation studies; these should be summarized with specific numbers and references to the results section or tables.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback on the manuscript. We address the single major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that discretizing into voxels and then applying graph inception networks 'makes the system avoid discretization errors' is load-bearing for both the novelty argument and the reported outperformance, yet no supporting analysis, invariance proof, or boundary-crossing experiment is referenced. Fixed voxel partitioning inherently quantizes continuous 3D coordinates; without demonstrated continuity or invariance to voxel origin when points cross faces, residual quantization error remains, consistent with the stress-test concern.

Authors: We agree that the abstract phrasing is imprecise and that the manuscript provides no explicit analysis, proof, or boundary experiment to support the claim of avoiding discretization errors. The intended meaning is that, unlike pure voxelization (which replaces continuous coordinates with discrete voxel indices and thereby loses intra-voxel geometry), PCT keeps the original continuous 3D coordinates of every point and processes them with graph networks that operate on those exact positions inside each voxel. This reduces the information loss associated with traditional voxel discretization. Nevertheless, the fixed voxel grid still partitions space, and points near boundaries can be affected by the choice of origin. We will therefore revise the abstract to replace the absolute claim with a comparative statement and add a short clarifying paragraph (with a simple shift-invariance check) in the method section of the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical system design with no derivation chain or self-referential predictions

full rationale

The paper describes a hybrid system (voxel discretization followed by per-voxel graph inception networks) and asserts that the combination 'makes the system avoid discretization errors and work for large-scale scenarios.' This is presented as a design choice whose value is demonstrated by empirical outperformance on LiDAR sweeps, not as a mathematical derivation or prediction derived from fitted parameters. No equations, uniqueness theorems, ansatzes, or self-citations appear in the supplied text that reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. The reader's supplied circularity score of 2.0 is consistent with the absence of any load-bearing derivation steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated or derivable from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5702 in / 1124 out tokens · 21925 ms · 2026-05-25T14:55:55.934113+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

INTRODUCTION With the growth of 3D sensing technologies, one can now use a large number of 3D points to precisely represent ob- jects’ surfaces and surrounding environments. We call those 3D points a 3D point cloud ; it has a growing impact on vari- ous applications, including autonomous driving, virtual real- ity and scanning of historical artifacts [1]....

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906
[2]

3D points captured in a outdoor environment have huge variations, while the available training data are lim- ited

METHODOLOGY Similarly to many standard representation problems, the overall goal is to use a low-dimensional feature vec- tor to represent a large-scale 3D point cloud; however, a large-scale 3D point cloud has its own challenges: (i) vari- ations. 3D points captured in a outdoor environment have huge variations, while the available training data are lim-...

work page
[3]

We validate the proposed PCT in a standard autonomous-driving dataset, KITTI [2], which has been recorded from a moving platform while driving in and around Karlsruhe

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS Dataset. We validate the proposed PCT in a standard autonomous-driving dataset, KITTI [2], which has been recorded from a moving platform while driving in and around Karlsruhe. Real-time LiDAR sweeps are collected by a Velo- dyne HDL-64E rotating 3D laser scanner, with 10 Hz, 64 beams, 0.09 degree angular resolution, around 1.3 millio...

work page
[4]

The PCT includes two phases: 3D partition and voxel-level representations, which makes it acts like the blocked discrete cosine transform for 2D images

CONCLUSIONS We propose the PCT to provide compact representations for large-scale 3D point clouds. The PCT includes two phases: 3D partition and voxel-level representations, which makes it acts like the blocked discrete cosine transform for 2D images. We propose GIN to improve voxel-level represen- tations. The proposed PCT is applied to represent real-ti...

work page
[5]

3D is here: Point cloud library (PCL),

R. B. Rusu and S. Cousins, “3D is here: Point cloud library (PCL),” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. , Shanghai, May 2011

work page 2011
[6]

Are we ready for autonomous driving? the kitti vision benchmark suite,

A. Geiger, P. Lenz, and R. Urtasun, “Are we ready for autonomous driving? the kitti vision benchmark suite,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recogn. , Providence, RI, June 2012

work page 2012
[7]

Vetterli, J

M. Vetterli, J. Kova ˇcevi´c, and V . K. Goyal, F oundations of Signal Processing , Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, http://foundationsofsignalprocessing.org

work page 2014
[8]

Octree-based point-cloud compression,

R. Schnabel and R. Klein, “Octree-based point-cloud compression,” in SPBG’06 Proceedings of the 3rd Eu- rographics / IEEE VGTC conference on Point-Based Graphics, Boston, MA, July 2006

work page 2006
[9]

Generalized value iteration networks: Life beyond lattices,

S. Niu, S. Chen, H. Guo, C. Targonski, M. C. Smith, and J. Kova ˇcevi´c, “Generalized value iteration networks: Life beyond lattices,” in AAAI, Feb. 2018

work page 2018
[10]

Emerging MPEG stan- dards for point cloud compression,

S. Schwarz, M. Preda, V . Baroncini, M. Budagavi, P. C ´esar, P. A. Chou, R. A. Cohen, M. Krivokuca, S. Lasserre, Z. Li, J. Llach, K. Mammou, R. Mekuria, O. Nakagami, E. Siahaan, A. J. Tabatabai, A. M. Tourapis, and V . Zakharchenko, “Emerging MPEG stan- dards for point cloud compression,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Circuits Syst., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 133–...

work page 2019
[11]

Graph-based compression of dynamic 3D point cloud sequences,

D. Thanou, P. A. Chou, and P. Frossard, “Graph-based compression of dynamic 3D point cloud sequences,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. , vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1765– 1778, Feb. 2016

work page 2016
[12]

Compression of dynamic 3D point clouds using subdivisional meshes and graph wavelet transforms,

A. Anis, P. A. Chou, and A. Ortega, “Compression of dynamic 3D point clouds using subdivisional meshes and graph wavelet transforms,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. , Shanghai, Mar. 2016, pp. 6360–6364

work page 2016
[13]

Weighted multi- projection: 3d point cloud denoising with estimated tan- gent planes,

C. Duan, S. Chen, and J. Kova ˇcevi´c, “Weighted multi- projection: 3d point cloud denoising with estimated tan- gent planes,” in Proc. IEEE Glob. Conf. Signal Informa- tion Process., Anaheim, CA, Nov. 2018

work page 2018
[14]

3D Point Cloud Denoising using Graph Laplacian Regularization of a Low Dimensional Manifold Model

J. Zeng, G. Cheung, M. Ng, and C. Yang J. Pang, “3d point cloud denoising using graph laplacian regular- ization of a low dimensional manifold model,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.07252, 2018

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[15]

Reconstruc- tion of B-spline surfaces from scattered data points,

B. F. Gregorski, B. Hamann, and K. I. Joy, “Reconstruc- tion of B-spline surfaces from scattered data points,” in Proc. Comput. Graphics Int.l , Geneva, June 2000, pp. 163–170

work page 2000
[16]

Fast plane ex- traction in organized point clouds using agglomerative hierarchical clustering,

C. Feng, Y . Taguchi, and V . Kamat, “Fast plane ex- traction in organized point clouds using agglomerative hierarchical clustering,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., Hong Kong, May 2014, pp. 6218–6225

work page 2014
[17]

Pole- based localization for autonomous vehicles in urban sce- narios,

R. Spangenberg, D. Goehring, and R. Rojas, “Pole- based localization for autonomous vehicles in urban sce- narios,” in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intel- ligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , Dec. 2016

work page 2016
[18]

Deep continuous fusion for multi-sensor 3d object detec- tion,

M. Liang, B. Yang, S. Wang, and R. Urtasun, “Deep continuous fusion for multi-sensor 3d object detec- tion,” in The European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Sept. 2018

work page 2018
[19]

Fast resampling of 3d point clouds via graphs,

S. Chen, D. Tian, C. Feng, A. Vetro, and J. Kova ˇcevi´c, “Fast resampling of 3d point clouds via graphs,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 666–681, Feb. 2018

work page 2018
[20]

Geometrically stable sampling for the ICP algorithm,

N. Gelfand, L. Ikemoto, S. Rusinkiewicz, and M. Levoy, “Geometrically stable sampling for the ICP algorithm,” in F ourth International Conference on 3D Digital Imag- ing and Modeling (3DIM) , Oct. 2003

work page 2003
[21]

Real-time high-resolution sparse voxelization with application to image-based modeling,

C. T. Loop, C. Zhang, and Z. Zhang, “Real-time high-resolution sparse voxelization with application to image-based modeling,” in Proc. High-Perform. Graph- ics, Anaheim, CA, July 2013, pp. 73–80

work page 2013
[22]

Octomap: An efﬁcient probabilistic 3D mapping framework based on octrees,

A. Hornung, K. M. Wurm, M. Bennewitz, C. Stachniss, and W. Burgard, “Octomap: An efﬁcient probabilistic 3D mapping framework based on octrees,” Autonom. Robots, pp. 189–206, Apr. 2013

work page 2013
[23]

Accelerated generative models for 3D point cloud data,

B. Eckart, K. Kim, A. Troccoli, A. Kelly, and J. Kautz, “Accelerated generative models for 3D point cloud data,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recogn., Las Vegas, NV , June 2016

work page 2016
[24]

Learning Representations and Generative Models for 3D Point Clouds

P. Achlioptas, O. Diamanti, I. Mitliagkas, and L. Guibas, “Representation learning and adversarial generation of 3d point clouds,” arXiv:1707.02392., June 2017

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[25]

Foldingnet: Point cloud auto-encoder via deep grid deformation,

Y . Yang, C. Feng, Y . Shen, and D. Tian, “Foldingnet: Point cloud auto-encoder via deep grid deformation,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recogn. , June 2018

work page 2018
[26]

Atlasnet: A papier-mˆach´e approach to learn- ing 3d surface generation,

T. Groueix, M. Fisher, V . Kim, B. Russell, and M. Aubry, “Atlasnet: A papier-mˆach´e approach to learn- ing 3d surface generation,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recogn., June 2018

work page 2018
[27]

Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Clouds

Y . Wang, Y . Sun, Z. Liu, S. E. Sarma, M. M. Bronstein, and J. M. Solomon, “Dynamic graph cnn for learning on point clouds,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.07829, 2018

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[1] [1]

INTRODUCTION With the growth of 3D sensing technologies, one can now use a large number of 3D points to precisely represent ob- jects’ surfaces and surrounding environments. We call those 3D points a 3D point cloud ; it has a growing impact on vari- ous applications, including autonomous driving, virtual real- ity and scanning of historical artifacts [1]....

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

[2] [2]

3D points captured in a outdoor environment have huge variations, while the available training data are lim- ited

METHODOLOGY Similarly to many standard representation problems, the overall goal is to use a low-dimensional feature vec- tor to represent a large-scale 3D point cloud; however, a large-scale 3D point cloud has its own challenges: (i) vari- ations. 3D points captured in a outdoor environment have huge variations, while the available training data are lim-...

work page

[3] [3]

We validate the proposed PCT in a standard autonomous-driving dataset, KITTI [2], which has been recorded from a moving platform while driving in and around Karlsruhe

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS Dataset. We validate the proposed PCT in a standard autonomous-driving dataset, KITTI [2], which has been recorded from a moving platform while driving in and around Karlsruhe. Real-time LiDAR sweeps are collected by a Velo- dyne HDL-64E rotating 3D laser scanner, with 10 Hz, 64 beams, 0.09 degree angular resolution, around 1.3 millio...

work page

[4] [4]

The PCT includes two phases: 3D partition and voxel-level representations, which makes it acts like the blocked discrete cosine transform for 2D images

CONCLUSIONS We propose the PCT to provide compact representations for large-scale 3D point clouds. The PCT includes two phases: 3D partition and voxel-level representations, which makes it acts like the blocked discrete cosine transform for 2D images. We propose GIN to improve voxel-level represen- tations. The proposed PCT is applied to represent real-ti...

work page

[5] [5]

3D is here: Point cloud library (PCL),

R. B. Rusu and S. Cousins, “3D is here: Point cloud library (PCL),” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. , Shanghai, May 2011

work page 2011

[6] [6]

Are we ready for autonomous driving? the kitti vision benchmark suite,

A. Geiger, P. Lenz, and R. Urtasun, “Are we ready for autonomous driving? the kitti vision benchmark suite,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recogn. , Providence, RI, June 2012

work page 2012

[7] [7]

Vetterli, J

M. Vetterli, J. Kova ˇcevi´c, and V . K. Goyal, F oundations of Signal Processing , Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, http://foundationsofsignalprocessing.org

work page 2014

[8] [8]

Octree-based point-cloud compression,

R. Schnabel and R. Klein, “Octree-based point-cloud compression,” in SPBG’06 Proceedings of the 3rd Eu- rographics / IEEE VGTC conference on Point-Based Graphics, Boston, MA, July 2006

work page 2006

[9] [9]

Generalized value iteration networks: Life beyond lattices,

S. Niu, S. Chen, H. Guo, C. Targonski, M. C. Smith, and J. Kova ˇcevi´c, “Generalized value iteration networks: Life beyond lattices,” in AAAI, Feb. 2018

work page 2018

[10] [10]

Emerging MPEG stan- dards for point cloud compression,

S. Schwarz, M. Preda, V . Baroncini, M. Budagavi, P. C ´esar, P. A. Chou, R. A. Cohen, M. Krivokuca, S. Lasserre, Z. Li, J. Llach, K. Mammou, R. Mekuria, O. Nakagami, E. Siahaan, A. J. Tabatabai, A. M. Tourapis, and V . Zakharchenko, “Emerging MPEG stan- dards for point cloud compression,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Circuits Syst., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 133–...

work page 2019

[11] [11]

Graph-based compression of dynamic 3D point cloud sequences,

D. Thanou, P. A. Chou, and P. Frossard, “Graph-based compression of dynamic 3D point cloud sequences,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. , vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1765– 1778, Feb. 2016

work page 2016

[12] [12]

Compression of dynamic 3D point clouds using subdivisional meshes and graph wavelet transforms,

A. Anis, P. A. Chou, and A. Ortega, “Compression of dynamic 3D point clouds using subdivisional meshes and graph wavelet transforms,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. , Shanghai, Mar. 2016, pp. 6360–6364

work page 2016

[13] [13]

Weighted multi- projection: 3d point cloud denoising with estimated tan- gent planes,

C. Duan, S. Chen, and J. Kova ˇcevi´c, “Weighted multi- projection: 3d point cloud denoising with estimated tan- gent planes,” in Proc. IEEE Glob. Conf. Signal Informa- tion Process., Anaheim, CA, Nov. 2018

work page 2018

[14] [14]

3D Point Cloud Denoising using Graph Laplacian Regularization of a Low Dimensional Manifold Model

J. Zeng, G. Cheung, M. Ng, and C. Yang J. Pang, “3d point cloud denoising using graph laplacian regular- ization of a low dimensional manifold model,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.07252, 2018

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[15] [15]

Reconstruc- tion of B-spline surfaces from scattered data points,

B. F. Gregorski, B. Hamann, and K. I. Joy, “Reconstruc- tion of B-spline surfaces from scattered data points,” in Proc. Comput. Graphics Int.l , Geneva, June 2000, pp. 163–170

work page 2000

[16] [16]

Fast plane ex- traction in organized point clouds using agglomerative hierarchical clustering,

C. Feng, Y . Taguchi, and V . Kamat, “Fast plane ex- traction in organized point clouds using agglomerative hierarchical clustering,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., Hong Kong, May 2014, pp. 6218–6225

work page 2014

[17] [17]

Pole- based localization for autonomous vehicles in urban sce- narios,

R. Spangenberg, D. Goehring, and R. Rojas, “Pole- based localization for autonomous vehicles in urban sce- narios,” in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intel- ligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , Dec. 2016

work page 2016

[18] [18]

Deep continuous fusion for multi-sensor 3d object detec- tion,

M. Liang, B. Yang, S. Wang, and R. Urtasun, “Deep continuous fusion for multi-sensor 3d object detec- tion,” in The European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Sept. 2018

work page 2018

[19] [19]

Fast resampling of 3d point clouds via graphs,

S. Chen, D. Tian, C. Feng, A. Vetro, and J. Kova ˇcevi´c, “Fast resampling of 3d point clouds via graphs,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 666–681, Feb. 2018

work page 2018

[20] [20]

Geometrically stable sampling for the ICP algorithm,

N. Gelfand, L. Ikemoto, S. Rusinkiewicz, and M. Levoy, “Geometrically stable sampling for the ICP algorithm,” in F ourth International Conference on 3D Digital Imag- ing and Modeling (3DIM) , Oct. 2003

work page 2003

[21] [21]

Real-time high-resolution sparse voxelization with application to image-based modeling,

C. T. Loop, C. Zhang, and Z. Zhang, “Real-time high-resolution sparse voxelization with application to image-based modeling,” in Proc. High-Perform. Graph- ics, Anaheim, CA, July 2013, pp. 73–80

work page 2013

[22] [22]

Octomap: An efﬁcient probabilistic 3D mapping framework based on octrees,

A. Hornung, K. M. Wurm, M. Bennewitz, C. Stachniss, and W. Burgard, “Octomap: An efﬁcient probabilistic 3D mapping framework based on octrees,” Autonom. Robots, pp. 189–206, Apr. 2013

work page 2013

[23] [23]

Accelerated generative models for 3D point cloud data,

B. Eckart, K. Kim, A. Troccoli, A. Kelly, and J. Kautz, “Accelerated generative models for 3D point cloud data,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recogn., Las Vegas, NV , June 2016

work page 2016

[24] [24]

Learning Representations and Generative Models for 3D Point Clouds

P. Achlioptas, O. Diamanti, I. Mitliagkas, and L. Guibas, “Representation learning and adversarial generation of 3d point clouds,” arXiv:1707.02392., June 2017

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[25] [25]

Foldingnet: Point cloud auto-encoder via deep grid deformation,

Y . Yang, C. Feng, Y . Shen, and D. Tian, “Foldingnet: Point cloud auto-encoder via deep grid deformation,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recogn. , June 2018

work page 2018

[26] [26]

Atlasnet: A papier-mˆach´e approach to learn- ing 3d surface generation,

T. Groueix, M. Fisher, V . Kim, B. Russell, and M. Aubry, “Atlasnet: A papier-mˆach´e approach to learn- ing 3d surface generation,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recogn., June 2018

work page 2018

[27] [27]

Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Clouds

Y . Wang, Y . Sun, Z. Liu, S. E. Sarma, M. M. Bronstein, and J. M. Solomon, “Dynamic graph cnn for learning on point clouds,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.07829, 2018

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018