REVIEW 1 cited by
Towards Automating the AI Operations Lifecycle
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Towards Automating the AI Operations Lifecycle
read the original abstract
Today's AI deployments often require significant human involvement and skill in the operational stages of the model lifecycle, including pre-release testing, monitoring, problem diagnosis and model improvements. We present a set of enabling technologies that can be used to increase the level of automation in AI operations, thus lowering the human effort required. Since a common source of human involvement is the need to assess the performance of deployed models, we focus on technologies for performance prediction and KPI analysis and show how they can be used to improve automation in the key stages of a typical AI operations pipeline.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CITRUS: Candidate Inference and Temporal-tracking for Reliable, Unobtrusive Sensing of Wearable Heart Rate under Motion
A candidate-based causal Viterbi estimator with a learned accept/hold/reject reporting policy reduces motion-window heart-rate MAE from ≈10.8 to 6.2 BPM at 50% coverage on ring PPG and improves reported-window accurac...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.