REVIEW 1 cited by
Surprisal-Triggered Conditional Computation with Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Surprisal-Triggered Conditional Computation with Neural Networks
read the original abstract
Autoregressive neural network models have been used successfully for sequence generation, feature extraction, and hypothesis scoring. This paper presents yet another use for these models: allocating more computation to more difficult inputs. In our model, an autoregressive model is used both to extract features and to predict observations in a stream of input observations. The surprisal of the input, measured as the negative log-likelihood of the current observation according to the autoregressive model, is used as a measure of input difficulty. This in turn determines whether a small, fast network, or a big, slow network, is used. Experiments on two speech recognition tasks show that our model can match the performance of a baseline in which the big network is always used with 15% fewer FLOPs.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
When to Plan: Learning to Select Between Reactive Control and Deliberative Planning
An RL-trained meta-policy that uses ensemble uncertainty to choose between a cheap reactive policy and costly planning reaches goals faster than fixed baselines and adapts as the reactive policy improves.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.