Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

The Data Processing Pipeline for the MUSE Instrument

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.08638 v1 pith:2675XSXS submitted 2020-06-15 astro-ph.IM

The Data Processing Pipeline for the MUSE Instrument

Peter M. Weilbacher (1) , Ralf Palsa (2) , Ole Streicher (1) , Roland Bacon (3) , Tanya Urrutia (1) , Lutz Wisotzki (1) , Simon Conseil (3 , 4)
show 12 more authors
Bernd Husemann (5) Aur\'elien Jarno (3) Andreas Kelz (1) Arlette P\'econtal-Rousset (3) Johan Richard (3) Martin M. Roth (1) Fernando Selman (6) Jo\"el Vernet (2) ((1) Leibniz-Institut f\"ur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP) (2) ESO Garching (3) CRAL (4) Gemini (5) MPIA (6) ESO Santiago)
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords datapipelineprocessingdatacubesdescribefieldintegralmuse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Processing of raw data from modern astronomical instruments is nowadays often carried out using dedicated software, so-called "pipelines" which are largely run in automated operation. In this paper we describe the data reduction pipeline of the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) integral field spectrograph operated at ESO's Paranal observatory. This spectrograph is a complex machine: it records data of 1152 separate spatial elements on detectors in its 24 integral field units. Efficiently handling such data requires sophisticated software, a high degree of automation and parallelization. We describe the algorithms of all processing steps that operate on calibrations and science data in detail, and explain how the raw science data gets transformed into calibrated datacubes. We finally check the quality of selected procedures and output data products, and demonstrate that the pipeline provides datacubes ready for scientific analysis.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Lyman-alpha haloes in the aftermath of reionisation

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Lyα haloes around low-luminosity LAEs at z≥6 have exponential scale lengths ~3× smaller than at z~3 under matched intrinsic surface-brightness sensitivity, with stacks of non-detections showing no extended emission at high-z.

  2. Exploring the synergies of $[\mathrm{O\,II}]\lambda 3727$ with MUSE spectroscopy in PHANGS H II regions

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 accept novelty 5.5

    Adding SITELLE [O II] to PHANGS-MUSE for 556 H II regions recovers known metallicity-calibration offsets, shows <0.03–0.04 dex gradient scatter for many methods, and favors [S III]/[S II] as a robust ionization tracer.

  3. Multi-wavelength Constraints on the Transient EP250905a

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    EP250905a is best explained as a mildly off-axis structured-jet afterglow at z=2.714, possibly weakly magnified by a foreground galaxy at z=0.374.

  4. Exploring the synergies of $[\mathrm{O\,II}]\lambda 3727$ with MUSE spectroscopy in PHANGS H II regions

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Combining [O II] doublet data with MUSE spectra creates a homogeneous H II region catalog and compares strong-line metallicity calibrations, showing low scatter in radial gradients and [S III]/[S II] as a robust ioniz...