Forward Prediction for Physical Reasoning
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:NV3SEOWIrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Physical reasoning requires forward prediction: the ability to forecast what will happen next given some initial world state. We study the performance of state-of-the-art forward-prediction models in the complex physical-reasoning tasks of the PHYRE benchmark. We do so by incorporating models that operate on object or pixel-based representations of the world into simple physical-reasoning agents. We find that forward-prediction models can improve physical-reasoning performance, particularly on complex tasks that involve many objects. However, we also find that these improvements are contingent on the test tasks being small variations of train tasks, and that generalization to completely new task templates is challenging. Surprisingly, we observe that forward predictors with better pixel accuracy do not necessarily lead to better physical-reasoning performance.Nevertheless, our best models set a new state-of-the-art on the PHYRE benchmark.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bridging Physical Reasoning and Task Generalization via Visual Action Outcome Reasoning Alignment
VAORA aligns VLM chain-of-thought reasoning with visual scene observations and post-action outcomes via structured symbolic rewards, achieving cross-task and cross-environment generalization on physical reasoning benchmarks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.