Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Approaching the Self-Dual Point of the Sinh-Gordon model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.00154 v1 pith:EOOTTRC5 submitted 2020-06-30 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechhep-latnlin.SI

Approaching the Self-Dual Point of the Sinh-Gordon model

classification hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechhep-latnlin.SI
keywords modelcouplinglagrangiansinh-gordonbasicdifferentformulationhere
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

One of the most striking but mysterious properties of the sinh-Gordon model (ShG) is the $b \rightarrow 1/b$ self-duality of its $S$-matrix, of which there is no trace in its Lagrangian formulation. Here $b$ is the coupling appearing in the model's eponymous hyperbolic cosine present in its Lagrangian, $\cosh(b\phi)$. In this paper we develop truncated spectrum methods (TSMs) for studying the sinh-Gordon model at a finite volume as we vary the coupling constant. We obtain the expected results for $b \ll 1$ and intermediate values of $b$, but as the self-dual point $b=1$ is approached, the basic application of the TSM to the ShG breaks down. We find that the TSM gives results with a strong cutoff $E_c$ dependence, which disappears according only to a very slow power law in $E_c$. Standard renormalization group strategies -- whether they be numerical or analytic -- also fail to improve upon matters here. We thus explore three strategies to address the basic limitations of the TSM in the vicinity of $b=1$. In the first, we focus on the small-volume spectrum. We attempt to understand how much of the physics of the ShG is encoded in the zero mode part of its Hamiltonian, in essence how `quantum mechanical' vs `quantum field theoretic' the problem is. In the second, we identify the divergencies present in perturbation theory and perform their resummation using a supra-Borel approximate. In the third approach, we use the exact form factors of the model to treat the ShG at one value of $b$ as a perturbation of a ShG at a different coupling. In the light of this work, we argue that the strong coupling phase $b > 1$ of the Lagrangian formulation of model may be different from what is na\"ively inferred from its $S$-matrix. In particular, we present an argument that the theory is massless for $b>1$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Variational Method in Quantum Field Theory

    hep-th 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0

    A variational ansatz built from exact sinh-Gordon vacuum expectation values yields quantitative estimates of the φ⁴ ground-state energy and mass, validated by Borel resummation and truncated-space numerics.