Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Cross-Entropy Method Variants for Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.09043 v1 pith:7NH5ZK3C submitted 2020-09-18 cs.LG math.OCstat.ML

Cross-Entropy Method Variants for Optimization

classification cs.LG math.OCstat.ML
keywords functionobjectiveminimalocalmethodoptimizationsurrogatecalls
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The cross-entropy (CE) method is a popular stochastic method for optimization due to its simplicity and effectiveness. Designed for rare-event simulations where the probability of a target event occurring is relatively small, the CE-method relies on enough objective function calls to accurately estimate the optimal parameters of the underlying distribution. Certain objective functions may be computationally expensive to evaluate, and the CE-method could potentially get stuck in local minima. This is compounded with the need to have an initial covariance wide enough to cover the design space of interest. We introduce novel variants of the CE-method to address these concerns. To mitigate expensive function calls, during optimization we use every sample to build a surrogate model to approximate the objective function. The surrogate model augments the belief of the objective function with less expensive evaluations. We use a Gaussian process for our surrogate model to incorporate uncertainty in the predictions which is especially helpful when dealing with sparse data. To address local minima convergence, we use Gaussian mixture models to encourage exploration of the design space. We experiment with evaluation scheduling techniques to reallocate true objective function calls earlier in the optimization when the covariance is the largest. To test our approach, we created a parameterized test objective function with many local minima and a single global minimum. Our test function can be adjusted to control the spread and distinction of the minima. Experiments were run to stress the cross-entropy method variants and results indicate that the surrogate model-based approach reduces local minima convergence using the same number of function evaluations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Expert-Guided Forecast Editing for Time-Series Foundation Models

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    DEFT edits frozen time-series foundation-model forecasts by exploiting model samples and searching over trend/seasonal components, improving forecast quality under small expert-query budgets.

  2. AI-Augmented Model Predictive Control for Safe and Adaptive Rendezvous and Proximity Operations

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    An outer-loop supervisor that retunes MPC weights, safety penalties, and keep-out-zone margins in real time reports higher rendezvous success in the KSPDG adversarial simulation than fixed-parameter MPC, without stati...