REVIEW 1 cited by
A Survey on Recent Advances in Sequence Labeling from Deep Learning Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Survey on Recent Advances in Sequence Labeling from Deep Learning Models
read the original abstract
Sequence labeling (SL) is a fundamental research problem encompassing a variety of tasks, e.g., part-of-speech (POS) tagging, named entity recognition (NER), text chunking, etc. Though prevalent and effective in many downstream applications (e.g., information retrieval, question answering, and knowledge graph embedding), conventional sequence labeling approaches heavily rely on hand-crafted or language-specific features. Recently, deep learning has been employed for sequence labeling tasks due to its powerful capability in automatically learning complex features of instances and effectively yielding the stat-of-the-art performances. In this paper, we aim to present a comprehensive review of existing deep learning-based sequence labeling models, which consists of three related tasks, e.g., part-of-speech tagging, named entity recognition, and text chunking. Then, we systematically present the existing approaches base on a scientific taxonomy, as well as the widely-used experimental datasets and popularly-adopted evaluation metrics in the SL domain. Furthermore, we also present an in-depth analysis of different SL models on the factors that may affect the performance and future directions in the SL domain.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
PathCRF: Ball-Free Soccer Event Detection via Possession Path Inference from Player Trajectories
Using only player tracking, a dynamic masked CRF infers the possession path and detects soccer events with 75.7% F1, but on a single test match.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.