REVIEW 2 cited by
Comparison of Methods Generalizing Max- and Average-Pooling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Max- and average-pooling are the most popular pooling methods for downsampling in convolutional neural networks. In this paper, we compare different pooling methods that generalize both max- and average-pooling. Furthermore, we propose another method based on a smooth approximation of the maximum function and put it into context with related methods. For the comparison, we use a VGG16 image classification network and train it on a large dataset of natural high-resolution images (Google Open Images v5). The results show that none of the more sophisticated methods perform significantly better in this classification task than standard max- or average-pooling.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Distributed Gossip-GAN for Low-overhead CSI Feedback Training in FDD mMIMO-OFDM Systems
Gossip-GAN trains a distributed GAN across user devices and uses its generated channel samples to train a CSI feedback autoencoder, matching centralized training accuracy while reducing uplink overhead.
-
CA-I2P: Channel-Adaptive Registration Network with Global Optimal Selection
CA-I2P combines channel-adaptive feature adjustment and optimal-transport-based global selection to improve image-to-point cloud registration, reporting SOTA recall on RGB-D Scenes V2 (63.3% RR) and 7-Scenes (79.5% RR).
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.