Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Data Quality as Predictor of Voice Anti-Spoofing Generalization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.14602 v2 pith:XICSINIS submitted 2021-03-26 eess.AS cs.CVcs.LGcs.SD

Data Quality as Predictor of Voice Anti-Spoofing Generalization

classification eess.AS cs.CVcs.LGcs.SD
keywords anti-spoofingdataqualityvoicecorporamethodssamplespeaker
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Voice anti-spoofing aims at classifying a given utterance either as a bonafide human sample, or a spoofing attack (e.g. synthetic or replayed sample). Many anti-spoofing methods have been proposed but most of them fail to generalize across domains (corpora) -- and we do not know \emph{why}. We outline a novel interpretative framework for gauging the impact of data quality upon anti-spoofing performance. Our within- and between-domain experiments pool data from seven public corpora and three anti-spoofing methods based on Gaussian mixture and convolutive neural network models. We assess the impacts of long-term spectral information, speaker population (through x-vector speaker embeddings), signal-to-noise ratio, and selected voice quality features.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bona fide Cross Testing Reveals Weak Spot in Audio Deepfake Detection Systems

    cs.SD 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0

    A new evaluation protocol exhaustively pairs 164 speech synthesizers with nine bona fide speech types and reports max-pooled EERs, revealing larger failures than pooled averages show.