Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Multiagent Reinforcement Learning: Challenges and Directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.15691 v2 pith:SNZQP266 submitted 2021-06-29 cs.LG cs.AIcs.MAcs.NE

Deep Multiagent Reinforcement Learning: Challenges and Directions

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.MAcs.NE
keywords multiagentlearningreinforcementchallengesdeepaddressagentscommunication
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This paper surveys the field of deep multiagent reinforcement learning. The combination of deep neural networks with reinforcement learning has gained increased traction in recent years and is slowly shifting the focus from single-agent to multiagent environments. Dealing with multiple agents is inherently more complex as (a) the future rewards depend on multiple players' joint actions and (b) the computational complexity increases. We present the most common multiagent problem representations and their main challenges, and identify five research areas that address one or more of these challenges: centralised training and decentralised execution, opponent modelling, communication, efficient coordination, and reward shaping. We find that many computational studies rely on unrealistic assumptions or are not generalisable to other settings; they struggle to overcome the curse of dimensionality or nonstationarity. Approaches from psychology and sociology capture promising relevant behaviours, such as communication and coordination, to help agents achieve better performance in multiagent settings. We suggest that, for multiagent reinforcement learning to be successful, future research should address these challenges with an interdisciplinary approach to open up new possibilities in multiagent reinforcement learning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CoComposer: LLM Multi-agent Collaborative Music Composition

    cs.SD 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0

    A five-agent LLM system for ABC-notation composition scores modestly higher than ComposerX and a single LLM on an automated aesthetic model, but no error bars or significance tests are reported.