REVIEW 1 cited by
Personalized and Reliable Decision Sets: Enhancing Interpretability in Clinical Decision Support Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Personalized and Reliable Decision Sets: Enhancing Interpretability in Clinical Decision Support Systems
read the original abstract
In this study, we present a novel clinical decision support system and discuss its interpretability-related properties. It combines a decision set of rules with a machine learning scheme to offer global and local interpretability. More specifically, machine learning is used to predict the likelihood of each of those rules to be correct for a particular patient, which may also contribute to better predictive performances. Moreover, the reliability analysis of individual predictions is also addressed, contributing to further personalized interpretability. The combination of these several elements may be crucial to obtain the clinical stakeholders' trust, leading to a better assessment of patients' conditions and improvement of the physicians' decision-making.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Evaluating LLM Uncertainty in Long-Form Generation Using Deterministic Ground Truth
SALT enables judge-free unit-level uncertainty evaluation on deterministic long-form tasks and shows atomic ranking collapse, path-dependent error drivers, and a reasoning–ranking trade-off across 50+ LLMs.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.