REVIEW 1 cited by
Predicting Visual Improvement after Macular Hole Surgery: a Cautionary Tale on Deep Learning with Very Limited Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Predicting Visual Improvement after Macular Hole Surgery: a Cautionary Tale on Deep Learning with Very Limited Data
read the original abstract
We investigate the potential of machine learning models for the prediction of visual improvement after macular hole surgery from preoperative data (retinal images and clinical features). Collecting our own data for the task, we end up with only 121 total samples, putting our work in the very limited data regime. We explore a variety of deep learning methods for limited data to train deep computer vision models, finding that all tested deep vision models are outperformed by a simple regression model on the clinical features. We believe this is compelling evidence of the extreme difficulty of using deep learning on very limited data.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Dynamic Structural Recovery Parameters Enhance Prediction of Visual Outcomes After Macular Hole Surgery
Dynamic recovery-rate features and a cross-attention multimodal network improve classification of postoperative BCVA improvement in macular hole patients, but the gain is partly from same-timepoint structural status r...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.