REVIEW 1 cited by
Jordan and Einstein Frames from the perspective of ω=-3/2 Hamiltonian Brans-Dicke theory
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Jordan and Einstein Frames from the perspective of ω=-3/2 Hamiltonian Brans-Dicke theory
read the original abstract
We carefully perform a Hamiltonian Dirac's constraint analysis of $\omega=-\frac{3}{2}$ Brans-Dicke theory with Gibbons-Hawking-York (GHY) boundary term. The Poisson brackets are computed via functional derivatives. After a brief summary of the results for $\omega\neq-\frac{3}{2}$ case, we derive all Hamiltonian Dirac's constraints and constraint algebra both in the Jordan and Einstein frames. Confronting and contrasting Dirac's constraint algebra in both frames, it is shown that they are not equivalent. This highlights the transformations from the Jordan to the Einstein frames are not Hamiltonian canonical transformations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Canonical Clock Sectors and Relational Frame Equivalence in Brans--Dicke Theory
Apparent Jordan–Einstein inequivalence after relational deparametrization is a clock-sector mismatch; a frame-adapted canonical chart restores identical reduced Hamiltonians.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.