REVIEW 1 cited by
Assessing Evaluation Metrics for Speech-to-Speech Translation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Assessing Evaluation Metrics for Speech-to-Speech Translation
read the original abstract
Speech-to-speech translation combines machine translation with speech synthesis, introducing evaluation challenges not present in either task alone. How to automatically evaluate speech-to-speech translation is an open question which has not previously been explored. Translating to speech rather than to text is often motivated by unwritten languages or languages without standardized orthographies. However, we show that the previously used automatic metric for this task is best equipped for standardized high-resource languages only. In this work, we first evaluate current metrics for speech-to-speech translation, and second assess how translation to dialectal variants rather than to standardized languages impacts various evaluation methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
OpenSTBench: Beyond Semantic Evaluation for Speech Translation
OpenSTBench supplies a unified multidimensional protocol and code for evaluating S2TT and S2ST systems in both offline and streaming modes across translation, speech, speaker, emotion, temporal, and latency dimensions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.