Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Human Parity on CommonsenseQA: Augmenting Self-Attention with External Attention

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.03254 v3 pith:YUBNWLOY submitted 2021-12-06 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Yichong Xu , Chenguang Zhu , Shuohang Wang , Siqi Sun , Hao Cheng , Xiaodong Liu , Jianfeng Gao , Pengcheng He
show 2 more authors
Michael Zeng Xuedong Huang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords externalattentionhumanmechanismmodelsproposedreasoningsystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Most of today's AI systems focus on using self-attention mechanisms and transformer architectures on large amounts of diverse data to achieve impressive performance gains. In this paper, we propose to augment the transformer architecture with an external attention mechanism to bring external knowledge and context to bear. By integrating external information into the prediction process, we hope to reduce the need for ever-larger models and increase the democratization of AI systems. We find that the proposed external attention mechanism can significantly improve the performance of existing AI systems, allowing practitioners to easily customize foundation AI models to many diverse downstream applications. In particular, we focus on the task of Commonsense Reasoning, demonstrating that the proposed external attention mechanism can augment existing transformer models and significantly improve the model's reasoning capabilities. The proposed system, Knowledgeable External Attention for commonsense Reasoning (KEAR), reaches human parity on the open CommonsenseQA research benchmark with an accuracy of 89.4\% in comparison to the human accuracy of 88.9\%.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Teaching Smaller Language Models To Generalise To Unseen Compositional Questions (Full Thesis)

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Smaller language models can generalize to unseen compositional questions when trained and evaluated with retrieval-augmented contexts, and combining Wikipedia retrieval with LLM-generated rationales improves accuracy.

  2. ConspirED: A Dataset for Cognitive Traits of Conspiracy Theories and Large Language Model Safety

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new dataset annotates conspiracy texts with six cognitive traits, and experiments show LLMs reproduce conspiracy reasoning more readily than they deflect it.

  3. GL-Fusion: Rethinking the Combination of Graph Neural Network and Large Language model

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GL-Fusion merges message passing, full-text cross-attention, and twin GNN/LLM prediction heads into one model, reporting state-of-the-art results on ogbn-arxiv and ogbg-code2.

  4. Large Language Models Still Face Challenges in Multi-Hop Reasoning with External Knowledge

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    GPT-3.5 with chain-of-thought prompting still fails often on multi-hop reasoning with external knowledge, especially with distractors, counterfactual facts, non-sequential proof structures, and higher hop counts.

Pith tools