REVIEW 1 cited by
A Developmentally-Inspired Examination of Shape versus Texture Bias in Machines
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Developmentally-Inspired Examination of Shape versus Texture Bias in Machines
read the original abstract
Early in development, children learn to extend novel category labels to objects with the same shape, a phenomenon known as the shape bias. Inspired by these findings, Geirhos et al. (2019) examined whether deep neural networks show a shape or texture bias by constructing images with conflicting shape and texture cues. They found that convolutional neural networks strongly preferred to classify familiar objects based on texture as opposed to shape, suggesting a texture bias. However, there are a number of differences between how the networks were tested in this study versus how children are typically tested. In this work, we re-examine the inductive biases of neural networks by adapting the stimuli and procedure from Geirhos et al. (2019) to more closely follow the developmental paradigm and test on a wide range of pre-trained neural networks. Across three experiments, we find that deep neural networks exhibit a preference for shape rather than texture when tested under conditions that more closely replicate the developmental procedure.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On the Reliability of Cue Conflict and Beyond
Stylized cue-conflict bias scores are confounded by impure cues, imbalance, ratio metrics and restricted labels; REFINED-BIAS supplies pure balanced stimuli and full-label MRR sensitivity for reliable diagnosis.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.