Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Where Does the Performance Improvement Come From? -- A Reproducibility Concern about Image-Text Retrieval

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.03853 v3 pith:NRUR7NQB submitted 2022-03-08 cs.IR cs.CLcs.CV

Where Does the Performance Improvement Come From? -- A Reproducibility Concern about Image-Text Retrieval

classification cs.IR cs.CLcs.CV
keywords retrievalimage-textmodelsreproducibilityperformancesomeapproachescommunity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This article aims to provide the information retrieval community with some reflections on recent advances in retrieval learning by analyzing the reproducibility of image-text retrieval models. Due to the increase of multimodal data over the last decade, image-text retrieval has steadily become a major research direction in the field of information retrieval. Numerous researchers train and evaluate image-text retrieval algorithms using benchmark datasets such as MS-COCO and Flickr30k. Research in the past has mostly focused on performance, with multiple state-of-the-art methodologies being suggested in a variety of ways. According to their assertions, these techniques provide improved modality interactions and hence more precise multimodal representations. In contrast to previous works, we focus on the reproducibility of the approaches and the examination of the elements that lead to improved performance by pretrained and nonpretrained models in retrieving images and text. To be more specific, we first examine the related reproducibility concerns and explain why our focus is on image-text retrieval tasks. Second, we systematically summarize the current paradigm of image-text retrieval models and the stated contributions of those approaches. Third, we analyze various aspects of the reproduction of pretrained and nonpretrained retrieval models. To complete this, we conducted ablation experiments and obtained some influencing factors that affect retrieval recall more than the improvement claimed in the original paper. Finally, we present some reflections and challenges that the retrieval community should consider in the future. Our source code is publicly available at https://github.com/WangFei-2019/Image-text-Retrieval.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SEAL: Structure and Element Aware Learning to Improve Long Structured Document Retrieval

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0

    A contrastive fine-tuning recipe that adds HTML structure and element-masking signals improves long structured document retrieval, with reported MRR@10 gains of about four points on BGE-M3.