REVIEW 2 cited by
Energy-Latency Attacks via Sponge Poisoning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Sponge examples are test-time inputs optimized to increase energy consumption and prediction latency of deep networks deployed on hardware accelerators. By increasing the fraction of neurons activated during classification, these attacks reduce sparsity in network activation patterns, worsening the performance of hardware accelerators. In this work, we present a novel training-time attack, named sponge poisoning, which aims to worsen energy consumption and prediction latency of neural networks on any test input without affecting classification accuracy. To stage this attack, we assume that the attacker can control only a few model updates during training -- a likely scenario, e.g., when model training is outsourced to an untrusted third party or distributed via federated learning. Our extensive experiments on image classification tasks show that sponge poisoning is effective, and that fine-tuning poisoned models to repair them poses prohibitive costs for most users, highlighting that tackling sponge poisoning remains an open issue.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Energy Backdoor Attack to Deep Neural Networks
A backdoor attack that increases the firing density of a network's neurons on trigger inputs, at the cost of some accuracy.
-
Securing AI Systems: A Guide to Known Attacks and Impacts
A practitioner-oriented review that organizes known adversarial attacks on predictive and generative AI systems into eleven types mapped to confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.