REVIEW 1 cited by
Neural Predictor for Black-Box Adversarial Attacks on Speech Recognition
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Neural Predictor for Black-Box Adversarial Attacks on Speech Recognition
read the original abstract
Recent works have revealed the vulnerability of automatic speech recognition (ASR) models to adversarial examples (AEs), i.e., small perturbations that cause an error in the transcription of the audio signal. Studying audio adversarial attacks is therefore the first step towards robust ASR. Despite the significant progress made in attacking audio examples, the black-box attack remains challenging because only the hard-label information of transcriptions is provided. Due to this limited information, existing black-box methods often require an excessive number of queries to attack a single audio example. In this paper, we introduce NP-Attack, a neural predictor-based method, which progressively evolves the search towards a small adversarial perturbation. Given a perturbation direction, our neural predictor directly estimates the smallest perturbation that causes a mistranscription. In particular, it enables NP-Attack to accurately learn promising perturbation directions via gradient-based optimization. Experimental results show that NP-Attack achieves competitive results with other state-of-the-art black-box adversarial attacks while requiring a significantly smaller number of queries. The code of NP-Attack is available online.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Generative Testing of Automated Speech Recognition Systems
Phoneme-level latent interpolation in a TTS model yields ~98% black-box ASR failures with higher naturalness than waveform attacks and quality competitive with white-box PGD.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.