Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Diverse Counterfactual Explanations for Anomaly Detection in Time Series

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.11103 v1 pith:LHNDOPKM submitted 2022-03-21 cs.LG stat.ML

Diverse Counterfactual Explanations for Anomaly Detection in Time Series

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords seriescounterfactualdetectionmodeltimeanomalyexplanationsalgorithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Data-driven methods that detect anomalies in times series data are ubiquitous in practice, but they are in general unable to provide helpful explanations for the predictions they make. In this work we propose a model-agnostic algorithm that generates counterfactual ensemble explanations for time series anomaly detection models. Our method generates a set of diverse counterfactual examples, i.e, multiple perturbed versions of the original time series that are not considered anomalous by the detection model. Since the magnitude of the perturbations is limited, these counterfactuals represent an ensemble of inputs similar to the original time series that the model would deem normal. Our algorithm is applicable to any differentiable anomaly detection model. We investigate the value of our method on univariate and multivariate real-world datasets and two deep-learning-based anomaly detection models, under several explainability criteria previously proposed in other data domains such as Validity, Plausibility, Closeness and Diversity. We show that our algorithm can produce ensembles of counterfactual examples that satisfy these criteria and thanks to a novel type of visualisation, can convey a richer interpretation of a model's internal mechanism than existing methods. Moreover, we design a sparse variant of our method to improve the interpretability of counterfactual explanations for high-dimensional time series anomalies. In this setting, our explanation is localised on only a few dimensions and can therefore be communicated more efficiently to the model's user.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Meta Reinforcement Learning Approach to Goals-Based Wealth Management

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MetaRL pre-trained on GBWM problems delivers near-optimal dynamic strategies in 0.01s achieving 97.8% of DP optimal utility and handles larger problems where DP fails.

  2. DCFO: Density-Based Counterfactuals for Outliers -- Additional Material

    cs.LG 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    DCFO partitions the feature space by nearest-neighbour structure to make LOF scores differentiable, then uses gradient-based search to find the closest change that turns an outlier into an inlier.

  3. ConceptCF: Concept-based Counterfactuals for the Explainability of Time Series

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    ConceptCF generates time-series counterfactuals by evolving interpretable concepts (scale, bias, frequency bands) with a genetic algorithm, achieving top-tier or near-top-tier scores on validity, proximity, sparsity, ...