Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey on Graph Representation Learning Methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.01855 v2 pith:P363GFDU submitted 2022-04-04 cs.LG cs.SI

A Survey on Graph Representation Learning Methods

classification cs.LG cs.SI
keywords graphmethodsrepresentationlearningvectorsembeddinggraphsneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graphs representation learning has been a very active research area in recent years. The goal of graph representation learning is to generate graph representation vectors that capture the structure and features of large graphs accurately. This is especially important because the quality of the graph representation vectors will affect the performance of these vectors in downstream tasks such as node classification, link prediction and anomaly detection. Many techniques are proposed for generating effective graph representation vectors. Two of the most prevalent categories of graph representation learning are graph embedding methods without using graph neural nets (GNN), which we denote as non-GNN based graph embedding methods, and graph neural nets (GNN) based methods. Non-GNN graph embedding methods are based on techniques such as random walks, temporal point processes and neural network learning methods. GNN-based methods, on the other hand, are the application of deep learning on graph data. In this survey, we provide an overview of these two categories and cover the current state-of-the-art methods for both static and dynamic graphs. Finally, we explore some open and ongoing research directions for future work.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Same Graph Cross-Task Transfer in GNNs: Protocols and Predictors

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Under a fixed leakage-free protocol, NC→LP transfer reliably helps on homophilic graphs while LP→NC helps mainly when LP is easy and NC is unsaturated; homophily and CoTask Score guide mechanism choice.