Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Concept-level Debugging of Part-Prototype Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.15769 v2 pith:GZVVYNX7 submitted 2022-05-31 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords feedbackpart-prototypesprotopdebugprotopnetsconcept-levelevaluationexampleslearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Part-prototype Networks (ProtoPNets) are concept-based classifiers designed to achieve the same performance as black-box models without compromising transparency. ProtoPNets compute predictions based on similarity to class-specific part-prototypes learned to recognize parts of training examples, making it easy to faithfully determine what examples are responsible for any target prediction and why. However, like other models, they are prone to picking up confounders and shortcuts from the data, thus suffering from compromised prediction accuracy and limited generalization. We propose ProtoPDebug, an effective concept-level debugger for ProtoPNets in which a human supervisor, guided by the model's explanations, supplies feedback in the form of what part-prototypes must be forgotten or kept, and the model is fine-tuned to align with this supervision. Our experimental evaluation shows that ProtoPDebug outperforms state-of-the-art debuggers for a fraction of the annotation cost. An online experiment with laypeople confirms the simplicity of the feedback requested to the users and the effectiveness of the collected feedback for learning confounder-free part-prototypes. ProtoPDebug is a promising tool for trustworthy interactive learning in critical applications, as suggested by a preliminary evaluation on a medical decision making task.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Personalized Interpretability -- Interactive Alignment of Prototypical Parts Networks

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    YoursProtoP lets users label patches of an inconsistent prototype, then duplicates and fine-tunes the prototype kernel to separate two concepts while preserving classification accuracy.

  2. Do you see what I see? An Ambiguous Optical Illusion Dataset exposing limitations of Explainable AI

    cs.CV 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ambivision is a new dataset of AI-generated animal optical illusions, and the paper claims that adding gaze and eye annotations as visible image features improves classification while exposing limits of pixel-based ex...

Pith tools