REVIEW 2 cited by
Concept-level Debugging of Part-Prototype Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Part-prototype Networks (ProtoPNets) are concept-based classifiers designed to achieve the same performance as black-box models without compromising transparency. ProtoPNets compute predictions based on similarity to class-specific part-prototypes learned to recognize parts of training examples, making it easy to faithfully determine what examples are responsible for any target prediction and why. However, like other models, they are prone to picking up confounders and shortcuts from the data, thus suffering from compromised prediction accuracy and limited generalization. We propose ProtoPDebug, an effective concept-level debugger for ProtoPNets in which a human supervisor, guided by the model's explanations, supplies feedback in the form of what part-prototypes must be forgotten or kept, and the model is fine-tuned to align with this supervision. Our experimental evaluation shows that ProtoPDebug outperforms state-of-the-art debuggers for a fraction of the annotation cost. An online experiment with laypeople confirms the simplicity of the feedback requested to the users and the effectiveness of the collected feedback for learning confounder-free part-prototypes. ProtoPDebug is a promising tool for trustworthy interactive learning in critical applications, as suggested by a preliminary evaluation on a medical decision making task.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Personalized Interpretability -- Interactive Alignment of Prototypical Parts Networks
YoursProtoP lets users label patches of an inconsistent prototype, then duplicates and fine-tunes the prototype kernel to separate two concepts while preserving classification accuracy.
-
Do you see what I see? An Ambiguous Optical Illusion Dataset exposing limitations of Explainable AI
Ambivision is a new dataset of AI-generated animal optical illusions, and the paper claims that adding gaze and eye annotations as visible image features improves classification while exposing limits of pixel-based ex...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.