Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quantum computing overview: discrete vs. continuous variable models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.07246 v1 pith:4GNQCOOZ submitted 2022-06-15 quant-ph cs.AI

Quantum computing overview: discrete vs. continuous variable models

classification quant-ph cs.AI
keywords quantummodelvariablediscreteavailablecontinuousdimensionalqpus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this Near Intermediate-Scale Quantum era, there are two types of near-term quantum devices available on cloud: superconducting quantum processing units (QPUs) based on the discrete variable model and linear optics (photonics) QPUs based on the continuous variable (CV) model. Quantum computation in the discrete variable model is performed in a finite dimensional quantum state space and the CV model in an infinite dimensional space. In implementing quantum algorithms, the CV model offers more quantum gates that are not available in the discrete variable model. CV-based photonic quantum computers provide additional flexibility of controlling the length of the output vectors of quantum circuits, using different methods of measurement and the notion of cutoff dimension.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Formal Verification of Continuous-Variable Quantum Programs

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0

    A sound and relatively complete Hoare logic for continuous-variable quantum programs, with polynomial assertions and an automated weakest-precondition calculator.