Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Bag of Image Patch Embedding Behind the Success of Self-Supervised Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.08954 v2 pith:PVV6OFE6 submitted 2022-06-17 cs.CV cs.LG

Bag of Image Patch Embedding Behind the Success of Self-Supervised Learning

classification cs.CV cs.LG
keywords representationlearningpatchimagelocalself-supervisedachievesbagssl
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Self-supervised learning (SSL) has recently achieved tremendous empirical advancements in learning image representation. However, our understanding of the principle behind learning such a representation is still limited. This work shows that joint-embedding SSL approaches primarily learn a representation of image patches, which reflects their co-occurrence. Such a connection to co-occurrence modeling can be established formally, and it supplements the prevailing invariance perspective. We empirically show that learning a representation for fixed-scale patches and aggregating local patch representations as the image representation achieves similar or even better results than the baseline methods. We denote this process as BagSSL. Even with 32x32 patch representation, BagSSL achieves 62% top-1 linear probing accuracy on ImageNet. On the other hand, with a multi-scale pretrained model, we show that the whole image embedding is approximately the average of local patch embeddings. While the SSL representation is relatively invariant at the global scale, we show that locality is preserved when we zoom into local patch-level representation. Further, we show that patch representation aggregation can improve various SOTA baseline methods by a large margin. The patch representation is considerably easier to understand, and this work makes a step to demystify self-supervised representation learning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Toward a mechanistic understanding of inference in visual cortex and diffusion models

    q-bio.NC 2026-07 reject novelty 7.0

    A sparse-coding circuit with learned pairwise interactions, trained by score matching, reproduces diffusion-model-like contour completion and claims to expose the mechanism behind it.

  2. Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Video

    cs.CV 2024-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    V-JEPA models trained only on feature prediction from 2 million public videos achieve 81.9% on Kinetics-400, 72.2% on Something-Something-v2, and 77.9% on ImageNet-1K using frozen ViT-H/16 backbones.