Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Finite-group gauge theories on lattices as Hamiltonian systems with constraints

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.09775 v6 pith:K36UBM4G submitted 2022-06-20 hep-lat hep-thquant-ph

Finite-group gauge theories on lattices as Hamiltonian systems with constraints

classification hep-lat hep-thquant-ph
keywords gaugehamiltonianmodelstheoriesbriefconstraintsinterpretationlattices
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we present a brief but insightful overview of the gauge theories, which are defined on $ n $-dimensional lattices by using finite gauge groups, in order to show how they can be interpreted as a Hamiltonian system with constraints, analogous to what happens with the classical (continuous) gauge (field) theories. As this interpretation is not usually explored in the literature that discusses/introduces the concept of lattice gauge theory, but some recent works have been exploring Hamiltonian models in order to support some kind of quantum computation, we use this interpretation to, for example, present a brief geometric view of one class of these models: the Kitaev Quantum Double Models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Attention Degradation, Function Token Anchoring, and the Limits of Attention-Based Intervention in Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    In GPT-2, OPT-1.3B, and LLaMA-3.2 models, boosting attention to function-token positions by 16-24% does not improve contextual retrieval, so short-range attention degradation is descriptive rather than causal.