Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DGPO: Discovering Multiple Strategies with Diversity-Guided Policy Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.05631 v3 pith:IMC3TUN6 submitted 2022-07-12 cs.LG cs.AI

DGPO: Discovering Multiple Strategies with Diversity-Guided Policy Optimization

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords policystrategiesdgpodiverseoptimizationtaskachievesdiscovering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Most reinforcement learning algorithms seek a single optimal strategy that solves a given task. However, it can often be valuable to learn a diverse set of solutions, for instance, to make an agent's interaction with users more engaging, or improve the robustness of a policy to an unexpected perturbance. We propose Diversity-Guided Policy Optimization (DGPO), an on-policy algorithm that discovers multiple strategies for solving a given task. Unlike prior work, it achieves this with a shared policy network trained over a single run. Specifically, we design an intrinsic reward based on an information-theoretic diversity objective. Our final objective alternately constraints on the diversity of the strategies and on the extrinsic reward. We solve the constrained optimization problem by casting it as a probabilistic inference task and use policy iteration to maximize the derived lower bound. Experimental results show that our method efficiently discovers diverse strategies in a wide variety of reinforcement learning tasks. Compared to baseline methods, DGPO achieves comparable rewards, while discovering more diverse strategies, and often with better sample efficiency.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Weights or Skills? A Survey of Robot-Learning Techniques: from Action-Predicting Weights to Robots that Write their Own Skills

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    A taxonomy of robot learning on a weights-versus-skills axis, with a five-rung self-improvement ladder whose top cell (feedback plus memory plus search) holds only a few recent systems.