Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Analyzing Fairness in Deepfake Detection With Massively Annotated Databases

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.05845 v4 pith:DKUDLETN submitted 2022-08-11 cs.CV cs.CYcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.CYcs.LG
keywords deepfakedetectiondatasetsattributesmodelsannotatedbackbonebiased
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, image and video manipulations with Deepfake have become a severe concern for security and society. Many detection models and datasets have been proposed to detect Deepfake data reliably. However, there is an increased concern that these models and training databases might be biased and, thus, cause Deepfake detectors to fail. In this work, we investigate factors causing biased detection in public Deepfake datasets by (a) creating large-scale demographic and non-demographic attribute annotations with 47 different attributes for five popular Deepfake datasets and (b) comprehensively analysing attributes resulting in AI-bias of three state-of-the-art Deepfake detection backbone models on these datasets. The analysis shows how various attributes influence a large variety of distinctive attributes (from over 65M labels) on the detection performance which includes demographic (age, gender, ethnicity) and non-demographic (hair, skin, accessories, etc.) attributes. The results examined datasets show limited diversity and, more importantly, show that the utilised Deepfake detection backbone models are strongly affected by investigated attributes making them not fair across attributes. The Deepfake detection backbone methods trained on such imbalanced/biased datasets result in incorrect detection results leading to generalisability, fairness, and security issues. Our findings and annotated datasets will guide future research to evaluate and mitigate bias in Deepfake detection techniques. The annotated datasets and the corresponding code are publicly available.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Toward Calibrated, Fair, and accurate Deepfake Detection

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Face-Feature Tuning is a label-free logit remapping method that reduces FPR/TPR gaps across groups in deepfake detection while preserving overall accuracy.

  2. InfoDense: Density-Aware Regional Decisive Replay for Memory-Efficient Incremental Face Forgery Detection

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    InfoDense replays only density-ranked, forgery-decisive face fragments rather than full images, cutting memory use and improving incremental deepfake detection.

  3. Revisiting Deepfake Detection: Chronological Continual Learning and the Limits of Generalization

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A chronological continual learning study finds deepfake detectors retain past knowledge but generalize to future generators at near-random AUC around 0.5.

Pith tools