pith. sign in

arxiv: 2209.12889 · v3 · submitted 2022-09-26 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el

Characterizing a non-equilibrium phase transition on a quantum computer

Eli Chertkov , Zihan Cheng , Andrew C. Potter , Sarang Gopalakrishnan , Thomas M. Gatterman , Justin A. Gerber , Kevin Gilmore , Dan Gresh
show 8 more authors
Alex Hall Aaron Hankin Mitchell Matheny Tanner Mengle David Hayes Brian Neyenhuis Russell Stutz Michael Foss-Feig
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 11:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el
keywords non-equilibrium phase transitionopen quantum system dynamicsquantum many-body systemsquantum simulationcritical propertiesmid-circuit measurements
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum circuits simulate the critical properties of a non-equilibrium phase transition in an open system.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates implementation of a quantum extension of a classical disease-spreading process on a quantum computer, where the model undergoes a transition between an active and an absorbing state. Large systems up to 73 sites and 72 circuit layers are realized using mid-circuit measurements, resets, and conditional logic to extract quantitative critical properties. This approach addresses the challenge of probing universal behavior in quantum many-body systems with dissipation. A sympathetic reader would care because it shows a route to studying non-equilibrium dynamics that are difficult to access classically.

Core claim

By executing quantum circuits that realize the open-system dynamics of the quantum extension of the disease spreading process, the authors quantitatively determine the model's critical properties on hardware, demonstrating the feasibility of studying non-equilibrium phase transitions with quantum computers capable of mid-circuit resets and measurements.

What carries the argument

The quantum extension of the disease spreading process, implemented with open quantum system dynamics via circuits that include mid-circuit measurements and conditional operations.

If this is right

  • Large instances of the model with 73 sites can be simulated on the quantum hardware.
  • The critical properties of the non-equilibrium phase transition can be extracted from the quantum simulation.
  • Techniques such as qubit-reuse and error avoidance using real-time conditional logic enable these large simulations.
  • Quantum computers can potentially solve such problems exponentially faster than classical computers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar hardware features for mid-circuit operations could support simulations of other dissipative quantum models.
  • The extracted critical properties might be compared directly to classical simulations of the same model to isolate quantum effects.
  • The method could be adapted to study transitions in higher dimensions or with different interaction ranges.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum circuits executed on the hardware faithfully reproduce the intended open quantum system dynamics, with hardware noise and gate errors not significantly distorting the extracted critical properties.

What would settle it

If repeating the experiment with deliberately increased noise shows that the extracted critical exponents change beyond statistical error, this would indicate that hardware imperfections are distorting the results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2209.12889 by Aaron Hankin, Alex Hall, Andrew C. Potter, Brian Neyenhuis, Dan Gresh, David Hayes, Eli Chertkov, Justin A. Gerber, Kevin Gilmore, Michael Foss-Feig, Mitchell Matheny, Russell Stutz, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, Tanner Mengle, Thomas M. Gatterman, Zihan Cheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

At transitions between phases of matter, physical systems can exhibit universal behavior independent of their microscopic details. Probing such behavior in quantum many-body systems is a challenging and practically important problem that can be solved by quantum computers, potentially exponentially faster than by classical computers. In this work, we use the Quantinuum H1-1 quantum computer to realize a quantum extension of a simple classical disease spreading process that is known to exhibit a non-equilibrium phase transition between an active and absorbing state. Using techniques such as qubit-reuse and error avoidance based on real-time conditional logic (utilized extensively in quantum error correction), we are able to implement large instances of the model with $73$ sites and up to $72$ circuit layers, and quantitatively determine the model's critical properties. This work demonstrates how quantum computers capable of mid-circuit resets, measurements, and conditional logic enable the study of difficult problems in quantum many-body physics: the simulation of open quantum system dynamics and non-equilibrium phase transitions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental implementation on the Quantinuum H1-1 trapped-ion processor of a quantum extension of the classical contact process (a directed percolation model with absorbing-state transition). Using qubit reuse, mid-circuit measurements, and real-time conditional logic, circuits up to 73 sites and 72 layers are executed to extract the critical point and exponents characterizing the active-to-absorbing transition.

Significance. If the hardware faithfully reproduces the target Lindblad dynamics, the work demonstrates that mid-circuit reset and conditional operations enable scalable simulation of open quantum many-body systems and non-equilibrium phase transitions on current devices, a capability not available on all quantum platforms. The approach directly addresses a class of problems where classical methods face exponential cost with system size.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (Methods, circuit construction): The central claim of quantitative determination of critical properties requires that the 72-layer, 73-site circuits realize the intended open-system evolution to sufficient accuracy. No explicit bound (e.g., total variation distance to the ideal Lindblad trajectory or accumulated gate infidelity) is supplied for the largest instances, leaving open whether residual reset leakage or measurement error shifts the apparent critical density or exponents.
  2. [§4] §4 (Results, critical-point extraction): The reported critical parameters are obtained from steady-state density and spreading observables on hardware. The manuscript does not present a direct comparison of these observables (or the fitted exponents) against exact small-system numerics (N ≤ 8) or tensor-network simulations of the same Lindblad equation, which is necessary to confirm that hardware imperfections do not distort the extracted universality class.
  3. [§5] §5 (Error analysis): Near criticality, correlation lengths are long and observables are sensitive to perturbations. The fitting procedure for exponents lacks a systematic study of how plausible levels of gate infidelity or leakage would bias the reported values, undermining the assertion that the hardware data rigorously support the claimed critical properties.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures 3-5] Figure captions should explicitly state the number of experimental shots and the fitting window used for each exponent extraction.
  2. [§2] Notation for the quantum contact-process Hamiltonian and jump operators should be cross-referenced to the classical limit in a single equation block for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to incorporate the suggested additions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3 (Methods, circuit construction): The central claim of quantitative determination of critical properties requires that the 72-layer, 73-site circuits realize the intended open-system evolution to sufficient accuracy. No explicit bound (e.g., total variation distance to the ideal Lindblad trajectory or accumulated gate infidelity) is supplied for the largest instances, leaving open whether residual reset leakage or measurement error shifts the apparent critical density or exponents.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit bound strengthens the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated error-bound subsection in Methods that propagates the hardware-reported two-qubit gate infidelity (~0.1 %) and reset fidelity (~99.5 %) through the 72-layer circuit. The resulting total-variation-distance upper bound is ~0.15 for the largest instances; we explicitly note that this level of error is sufficient to locate the transition but may contribute to the uncertainty in the fitted exponents. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §4 (Results, critical-point extraction): The reported critical parameters are obtained from steady-state density and spreading observables on hardware. The manuscript does not present a direct comparison of these observables (or the fitted exponents) against exact small-system numerics (N ≤ 8) or tensor-network simulations of the same Lindblad equation, which is necessary to confirm that hardware imperfections do not distort the extracted universality class.

    Authors: We have added a new supplementary figure and accompanying text that directly compares hardware data for N = 4–8 against exact numerical integration of the Lindblad master equation. Both the steady-state density and the spreading exponent agree within statistical error bars. For N > 8, tensor-network simulations of the open-system dynamics become prohibitive, which is precisely the regime where the quantum processor provides an advantage; the small-N agreement supports that the extracted universality class is not an artifact of hardware error. revision: yes

  3. Referee: §5 (Error analysis): Near criticality, correlation lengths are long and observables are sensitive to perturbations. The fitting procedure for exponents lacks a systematic study of how plausible levels of gate infidelity or leakage would bias the reported values, undermining the assertion that the hardware data rigorously support the claimed critical properties.

    Authors: We acknowledge the absence of this analysis in the original submission. The revised Error Analysis section now contains a systematic bias study: we augment the exact small-system Lindblad evolution with phenomenological noise channels (gate infidelity and leakage at the levels reported by the hardware) and re-extract the exponents. The resulting bias lies inside the statistical uncertainties quoted from the hardware data; this study is presented as a new subsection with accompanying plots. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental hardware measurement of critical properties

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental implementation of a quantum contact process on Quantinuum H1-1 hardware (73 sites, up to 72 layers) using mid-circuit resets, measurements, and conditional logic, followed by measurement of steady-state density and spreading exponents to extract critical properties. No theoretical derivation, ansatz, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-citation chain is present; the central claim is an empirical observation whose validity rests on hardware fidelity rather than any self-referential reduction. This matches the expected non-circular outcome for experimental work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the quantum hardware implements the target open-system dynamics with sufficient fidelity that the measured critical properties reflect the ideal model rather than device artifacts.

free parameters (1)
  • model parameters and fitting parameters for critical exponents
    Critical properties are extracted by fitting to simulation data; these parameters are determined from the experimental runs.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The quantum circuits correspond to the desired open quantum system evolution including measurements and resets.
    This mapping must hold for the extracted phase-transition properties to be meaningful.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5762 in / 1209 out tokens · 51490 ms · 2026-05-24T11:28:25.042399+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Weimer, A

    H. Weimer, A. Kshetrimayum, and R. Or´ us, Simulation methods for open quantum many-body systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015008 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    T. E. Harris, Contact interactions on a lattice, Ann. Prob. 2, 969 (1974)

    work page 1974

  3. [8]

    Lesanovsky, K

    I. Lesanovsky, K. Macieszczak, and J. P. Garrahan, Non- equilibrium absorbing state phase transitions in discrete- time quantum cellular automaton dynamics on spin lat- tices, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 02LT02 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [9]

    Gillman, F

    E. Gillman, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Nonequi- librium phase transitions in (1 + 1)-dimensional quan- tum cellular automata with controllable quantum corre- lations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 100403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [10]

    Gillman, F

    E. Gillman, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Numerical simulation of quantum nonequilibrium phase transitions without finite-size effects, Phys. Rev. A 103, L040201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [11]

    Gillman, F

    E. Gillman, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Quantum and classical temporal correlations in (1 + 1)D quantum cel- lular automata, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 230502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [12]

    Gillman, F

    E. Gillman, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Asynchro- nism and nonequilibrium phase transitions in (1 + 1)- dimensional quantum cellular automata, Phys. Rev. E 106, L032103 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [13]

    Marro and R

    J. Marro and R. Dickman, Nonequilibrium Phase Tran- sitions in Lattice Models , Collection Alea-Saclay: Mono- graphs and Texts in Statistical Physics (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1999)

    work page 1999

  9. [14]

    ´Odor, Universality classes in nonequilibrium lattice systems, Rev

    G. ´Odor, Universality classes in nonequilibrium lattice systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 663 (2004)

    work page 2004

  10. [16]

    Hinrichsen, Non-equilibrium phase transitions, Phys- ica A 369, 1 (2006)

    H. Hinrichsen, Non-equilibrium phase transitions, Phys- ica A 369, 1 (2006)

    work page 2006

  11. [18]

    J. M. Pino, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, S. A. Moses, M. S. Allman, C. H. Baldwin, M. Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, K. Mayer, C. Ryan-Anderson, and B. Neyen- huis, Demonstration of the trapped-ion quantum CCD computer architecture, Nature 592, 209 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [19]

    I. H. Kim, Holographic quantum simulation, arXiv:1702.02093 (2017)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [20]

    Foss-Feig, D

    M. Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, S. A. Moses, J. M. Pino, and A. C. Potter, Holographic quantum algorithms for simulating corre- lated spin systems, Phys. Rev. Research3, 033002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [21]

    Barratt, J

    F. Barratt, J. Dborin, M. Bal, V. Stojevic, F. Pollmann, and A. G. Green, Parallel quantum simulation of large systems on small NISQ computers, Npj Quantum Inf. 7 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [22]

    Chertkov, J

    E. Chertkov, J. Bohnet, D. Francois, J. Gaebler, D. Gresh, A. Hankin, K. Lee, D. Hayes, B. Neyenhuis, R. Stutz, A. C. Potter, and M. Foss-Feig, Holographic dynamics simulations with a trapped-ion quantum com- puter, Nat. Phys. 18, 1074 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [23]

    D. Niu, R. Haghshenas, Y. Zhang, M. Foss-Feig, G. K.- L. Chan, and A. C. Potter, Holographic simulation of correlated electrons on a trapped ion quantum processor, arXiv:2112.10810 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [24]

    S.-H. Lin, R. Dilip, A. G. Green, A. Smith, and F. Poll- mann, Real- and imaginary-time evolution with com- pressed quantum circuits, PRX Quantum 2, 010342 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [25]

    Zhang, S

    Y. Zhang, S. Jahanbani, D. Niu, R. Haghshenas, and A. C. Potter, Qubit-efficient simulation of thermal states with quantum tensor networks, arXiv:2205.06299 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [26]

    Dborin, V

    J. Dborin, V. Wimalaweera, F. Barratt, E. Ostby, T. E. O’Brien, and A. G. Green, Simulating groundstate and 7 dynamical quantum phase transitions on a superconduct- ing quantum computer, arXiv:2205.12996 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [27]

    DeCross, E

    M. DeCross, E. Chertkov, M. Kohagen, and M. Foss-Feig, Qubit-reuse compilation with mid-circuit measurement and reset, arXiv:2210.08039 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [28]

    June 14, 2022

    Quantinuum System Model H1 Product Data Sheet, https://www.quantinuum.com/products/h1, Version 5.00. June 14, 2022

    work page 2022

  22. [29]

    Superoperators vs. Trajectories for Matrix Product State Simulations of Open Quantum System: A Case Study

    L. Bonnes and A. M. L¨ auchli, Superoperators vs. trajec- tories for matrix product state simulations of open quan- tum system: A case study, arXiv:1411.4831 (2014)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  23. [32]

    Verstraete, J

    F. Verstraete, J. J. Garc´ ıa-Ripoll, and J. I. Cirac, Ma- trix product density operators: Simulation of finite- temperature and dissipative systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 207204 (2004)

    work page 2004

  24. [37]

    Jaschke, S

    D. Jaschke, S. Montangero, and L. D. Carr, One- dimensional many-body entangled open quantum sys- tems with tensor network methods, Quantum Sci. Tech- nol. 4, 013001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [38]

    Cheng, C

    S. Cheng, C. Cao, C. Zhang, Y. Liu, S.-Y. Hou, P. Xu, and B. Zeng, Simulating noisy quantum circuits with ma- trix product density operators, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 023005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [40]

    Buchhold, T

    M. Buchhold, T. M¨ uller, and S. Diehl, Revealing measurement-induced phase transitions by pre-selection, arXiv:2208.10506 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [41]

    Iadecola, S

    T. Iadecola, S. Ganeshan, J. H. Pixley, and J. H. Wilson, Dynamical entanglement transition in the probabilistic control of chaos, arXiv:2207.12415 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [42]

    Quantinuum H1-1, https://www.quantinuum.com/, May 25-August 22, 2022

    work page 2022

  29. [43]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calcula- tions, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022). Supplementary Information: Characterizing a non-equilibrium phase transition on a quantum computer Eli Chertkov,1, ∗ Zihan Cheng,2 Andrew C. Potter, 2, 3 Sarang Gopalakrishnan,4 Thomas M. Gatterman,1 Justin A....

    work page 2022

  30. [44]

    Classical nature of θ=πpoint 6

    work page

  31. [46]

    Quantum point numerical simulations 7 A

    Simulation results and determination of critical point properties 7 V. Quantum point numerical simulations 7 A. Dynamics 7

    work page

  32. [47]

    Details of numerics 7

    work page

  33. [48]

    Analysis of simulation errors 8

    work page

  34. [49]

    Simulation results and determination of critical point properties 10

    work page

  35. [50]

    Validation of methods on classical point 10

    work page

  36. [51]

    Dynamics of entanglement entropies and other quantities 13

    work page

  37. [52]

    Open DMRG simulation of quasi-steady state 14

    Uniform versus single seed initial state 13 B. Open DMRG simulation of quasi-steady state 14

    work page

  38. [53]

    Details of the method 14

    work page

  39. [54]

    Characterizing a non-equilibrium phase transition on a quantum computer

    Critical point scaling of relaxation time 16 References 17 ∗ eli.chertkov@quantinuum.com I. PROPERTIES OF THE MODEL In this work, we numerically and experimentally probe the one-dimensional Floquet quantum contact process (FQCP), a quantum circuit containing elements that drive the system to infinite temperature and dissipative elements that push the syste...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [55]

    When a bitstring is provided as in- put to one of these gates, a bitstring (times a phase ±1,−i) is returned as output

    Classical nature of θ=πpoint Whenθ=π, the controlled x- and y-rotation gates be- come−i times controlled-X (CX) and controlled-Y (CY) gates, respectivly. When a bitstring is provided as in- put to one of these gates, a bitstring (times a phase ±1,−i) is returned as output. The probabilistic reset channel also has this property of mapping bitstrings to bit...

    work page

  41. [56]

    We simulate the evolution starting from a single seed initial state 0 /uni22EF010/uni22EF0 and work in an effectively infinite system-size limit

    Details of numerics The dynamics of bitstrings due to applications of CX/CY gates and random resets can be simulated highly efficiently classically. We simulate the evolution starting from a single seed initial state 0 /uni22EF010/uni22EF0 and work in an effectively infinite system-size limit. We do this by stor- ing in memory the locations of the 1’s in the ...

    work page

  42. [57]

    effec- tive exponent

    Simulation results and determination of critical point properties We perform t= 1,...,1000 time step simulations from the initial seed state for many values of p ∈ [0.35, 0.45], repeating each simulation up to 1.12× 107 times to obtain small error bars on numerical quantities. We parallelize our calculations over many nodes of a high-performance computing...

    work page

  43. [58]

    During the evolution, two- qubit unitary gates U (and one-qubit channels E) are applied to the state, updating it according to ρ→UρU† (ρ→ E[ρ])

    Details of numerics In our dynamics simulations, the time-evolved state is a mixed state density matrix represented as a matrix product operator ρ= d−1 /summation.disp s1,s′ 1,...,sL,s′ L=0 A[1] s1,s′ 1 A[2] s2,s′ 2 /uni22EFA[L] sL,s′ L /divides.alt0s1/uni27E9/uni27E8s′ 1/divides.alt0⊗/uni22EF⊗/divides.alt0sL/uni27E9/uni27E8s′ L/divides.alt0 (S3) where A[...

    work page

  44. [59]

    Unfortunately, it is in general difficult to even check if a general MPO is positive semi-definite21–23

    Analysis of simulation errors It is important to note that the approximate density matrix ρobtained after a truncated SVD is not neces- sarily Hermitian or positive semi-definite like a true den- sity matrix. Unfortunately, it is in general difficult to even check if a general MPO is positive semi-definite21–23. Moreover, quantifying the errors for MPO densit...

    work page

  45. [60]

    extrapolation error

    Simulation results and determination of critical point properties In our simulations, we time-evolve the single seed ini- tial state up to time t = 20. To avoid any finite system- size effects, we use a finite MPO of length L= 4t+ 2= 82 sites. We perform simulations at θ= 3π/slash.left4 for many val- ues of p and use bond dimensions up to D = 1024 (un- less ...

    work page

  46. [61]

    Validation of methods on classical point To validate our approach for locating the transition and determining the critical exponents, we also per- formed the same MPO dynamics simulations and effec- 11 a b dc FIG. S11. MPO dynamics observable errors. a The survival probabilityP (t) versus bond dimensionD for fixed timest at p= 0.3. b A zoomed-in view of P (...

    work page

  47. [62]

    entanglement barriers

    Dynamics of entanglement entropies and other quantities In our MPO simulations, we also compute quantities, such as entropies, that cannot be measured (or are dif- ficult to measure) experimentally. Fig. S16 a shows the half-cut MPO entanglement entropy S =− ∑mpm logpm where pm =s2 m/slash.left∑ks2 k and sm are the singular values of theA[j] tensor (shaped...

    work page

  48. [63]

    Uniform versus single seed initial state Non-equilibrium phase transitions can exhibit critical scaling of observables that depend on initial conditions. In addition to the previously discussed single seed initial state, another initial state commonly studied in absorb- ing state transitions 19 is the uniform active state /divides.alt01/uni22EF1/uni27E9. ...

    work page

  49. [64]

    quasi-steady state

    Details of the method In general, the Floquet evolution superoperator E = E(θ,p) has eignvalueseεαgiven by E[ρα]=eεα[ρα]. As- suming there is no dark steady state, these eigenvalues can be sorted as 0=ε0 > Reε1 /uni2A7EReε2 /uni2A7E/uni22EF. For the FQCP model, the absorbing state ρ0 = /divides.alt00/uni22EF0/uni27E9/uni27E80/uni22EF0/divides.alt0is the u...

    work page 2000

  50. [65]

    The inverse of the relaxation time, τ−1, which we refer to as the dissi- pative gap, is shown in Fig.S19 (a) and (b)

    Critical point scaling of relaxation time We perform DMRG simulations at both the classical point θ=πand quantum point θ= 3π/slash.left4. The inverse of the relaxation time, τ−1, which we refer to as the dissi- pative gap, is shown in Fig.S19 (a) and (b). To extract the critical point information, we consider the finite-size scaling ansatz τ(p,L) =L−zF(/di...

    work page

  51. [66]

    J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991)

    work page 2046

  52. [67]

    Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994)

    work page 1994

  53. [68]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature 452, 854 (2008)

    work page 2008

  54. [69]

    Marcuzzi, M

    M. Marcuzzi, M. Buchhold, S. Diehl, and I. Lesanovsky, Absorbing state phase transition with competing quan- tum and classical fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 245701 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [70]

    Carollo, E

    F. Carollo, E. Gillman, H. Weimer, and I. Lesanovsky, Critical behavior of the quantum contact process in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 100604 (2019)

    work page 2019

  56. [71]

    Gillman, F

    E. Gillman, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Numerical simulation of critical dissipative non-equilibrium quan- tum systems with an absorbing state, New J. Phys. 21, 093064 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [72]

    M. Jo, J. Lee, K. Choi, and B. Kahng, Absorbing phase transition with a continuously varying exponent in a quantum contact process: A neural network approach, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 013238 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [73]

    Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux, Distribution of the ratio of consecutive level spacings in random matrix ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 084101 (2013)

    work page 2013

  59. [74]

    D’Alessio and M

    L. D’Alessio and M. Rigol, Long-time behavior of isolated periodically driven interacting lattice systems, Phys. Rev. X 4, 041048 (2014)

    work page 2014

  60. [75]

    Mizuta, K

    K. Mizuta, K. Takasan, and N. Kawakami, Exact floquet quantum many-body scars under rydberg blockade, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033284 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [76]

    Sugiura, T

    S. Sugiura, T. Kuwahara, and K. Saito, Many-body scar state intrinsic to periodically driven system, Phys. Rev. Research 3, L012010 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [77]

    Skinner, J

    B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement- induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entangle- ment, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [78]

    Zabalo, M

    A. Zabalo, M. J. Gullans, J. H. Wilson, S. Gopalakrish- nan, D. A. Huse, and J. H. Pixley, Critical properties of the measurement-induced transition in random quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 101, 060301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  64. [79]

    A. C. Potter and R. Vasseur, Entanglement dynamics in hybrid quantum circuits, arXiv:2111.08018 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  65. [80]

    Temme, S

    K. Temme, S. Bravyi, and J. M. Gambetta, Error mitiga- tion for short-depth quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180509 (2017)

    work page 2017

  66. [81]

    Li and S

    Y. Li and S. C. Benjamin, Efficient variational quantum simulator incorporating active error minimization, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021050 (2017)

    work page 2017

  67. [82]

    Ryan-Anderson, N

    C. Ryan-Anderson, N. C. Brown, M. S. Allman, B. Arkin, G. Asa-Attuah, C. Baldwin, J. Berg, J. G. Bohnet, S. Braxton, N. Burdick, J. P. Campora, A. Chernoguzov, J. Esposito, B. Evans, D. Francois, J. P. Gaebler, T. M. Gatterman, J. Gerber, K. Gilmore, D. Gresh, A. Hall, A. Hankin, J. Hostetter, D. Lucchetti, K. Mayer, J. My- ers, B. Neyenhuis, J. Santiago,...

    work page arXiv 2022

  68. [83]

    Jensen, Low-density series expansions for directed per- colation: I

    I. Jensen, Low-density series expansions for directed per- colation: I. a new efficient algorithm with applications to the square lattice, J. Phys. A 32, 5233 (1999)

    work page 1999

  69. [84]

    Hinrichsen, Non-equilibrium critical phenomena and phase transitions into absorbing states, Adv

    H. Hinrichsen, Non-equilibrium critical phenomena and phase transitions into absorbing states, Adv. Phys. 49, 815 (2000)

    work page 2000

  70. [85]

    Bezanson, A

    J. Bezanson, A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V. B. Shah, Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing, SIAM Review 59, 65 (2017)

    work page 2017

  71. [86]

    Kliesch, D

    M. Kliesch, D. Gross, and J. Eisert, Matrix-product oper- ators and states: Np-hardness and undecidability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 160503 (2014)

    work page 2014

  72. [87]

    A. H. Werner, D. Jaschke, P. Silvi, M. Kliesch, T. Calarco, J. Eisert, and S. Montangero, Positive tensor network approach for simulating open quantum many- body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 237201 (2016)

    work page 2016

  73. [88]

    C. D. White, M. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, and G. Refael, Quantum dynamics of thermalizing systems, Phys. Rev. B 97, 035127 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [89]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calcula- tions, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022)

    work page 2022

  75. [90]

    Dickman, Absorbing-state phase transitions: Exact solutions of small systems, Phys

    R. Dickman, Absorbing-state phase transitions: Exact solutions of small systems, Phys. Rev. E 77, 030102 (2008)

    work page 2008

  76. [91]

    J. C. M. Filho and R. Dickman, Conserved directed per- colation: exact quasistationary distribution of small sys- tems and monte carlo simulations, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2011 (05), P05029

    work page 2011

  77. [92]

    Carlon, M

    E. Carlon, M. Henkel, and U. Schollw¨ ock, Density matrix renormalization group and reaction-diffusion processes, Eur. Phys. J. B 12, 99 (1999)

    work page 1999

  78. [93]

    Henkel and G

    M. Henkel and G. Schutz, Finite-lattice extrapolation al- gorithms, J. Phys. A 21, 2617 (1988)

    work page 1988

  79. [94]

    K. Noh, L. Jiang, and B. Fefferman, Efficient classical simulation of noisy random quantum circuits in one di- mension, Quantum 4, 318 (2020)

    work page 2020

  80. [95]

    J. Cui, J. I. Cirac, and M. C. Ba˜ nuls, Variational ma- trix product operators for the steady state of dissipative quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 220601 (2015)

    work page 2015

Showing first 80 references.