REVIEW 2 cited by
Unified Detoxifying and Debiasing in Language Generation via Inference-time Adaptive Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Warning: this paper contains model outputs exhibiting offensiveness and biases. Recently pre-trained language models (PLMs) have prospered in various natural language generation (NLG) tasks due to their ability to generate fairly fluent text. Nevertheless, these models are observed to capture and reproduce harmful contents in training corpora, typically toxic language and social biases, raising severe moral issues. Prior works on ethical NLG tackle detoxifying and debiasing separately, which is problematic since we find debiased models still exhibit toxicity while detoxified ones even exacerbate social biases. To address such a challenge, we propose the first unified framework of detoxifying and debiasing called UDDIA, which jointly formalizes these two problems as rectifying the output space. We theoretically interpret our framework as learning a text distribution mixing weighted attributes. Besides, UDDIA conducts adaptive optimization of only a few parameters during decoding based on a parameter-efficient tuning schema without any training data. This leads to minimal generation quality loss and improved rectification performance with acceptable computational cost. Experimental results demonstrate that compared to several strong baselines, UDDIA achieves debiasing and detoxifying simultaneously and better balances efficiency and effectiveness, taking a further step towards practical ethical NLG.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
IRepair: An Intent-Aware Approach to Repair Data-Driven Errors in Large Language Models
IRepair selects the transformer block with the largest gradient response to toxic examples and fine-tunes only that block, achieving better toxicity reduction with less perplexity degradation than DPO, DAPT, and DAPT+KL.
-
Bias Unveiled: Investigating Social Bias in LLM-Generated Code
An evaluation framework and 343-task benchmark show that four code LLMs produce socially biased code, and iterative bias feedback reduces measured bias substantially.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.