The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2301.08912 · v1 · pith:YH6TOLJW · submitted 2023-01-21 · cs.CL · cs.LG

Rationalization for Explainable NLP: A Survey

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:YH6TOLJWrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords rationalizationexplainablelanguagenaturalsurveyaccessiblebecauseexplainability
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recent advances in deep learning have improved the performance of many Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks such as translation, question-answering, and text classification. However, this improvement comes at the expense of model explainability. Black-box models make it difficult to understand the internals of a system and the process it takes to arrive at an output. Numerical (LIME, Shapley) and visualization (saliency heatmap) explainability techniques are helpful; however, they are insufficient because they require specialized knowledge. These factors led rationalization to emerge as a more accessible explainable technique in NLP. Rationalization justifies a model's output by providing a natural language explanation (rationale). Recent improvements in natural language generation have made rationalization an attractive technique because it is intuitive, human-comprehensible, and accessible to non-technical users. Since rationalization is a relatively new field, it is disorganized. As the first survey, rationalization literature in NLP from 2007-2022 is analyzed. This survey presents available methods, explainable evaluations, code, and datasets used across various NLP tasks that use rationalization. Further, a new subfield in Explainable AI (XAI), namely, Rational AI (RAI), is introduced to advance the current state of rationalization. A discussion on observed insights, challenges, and future directions is provided to point to promising research opportunities.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Compressive Knowledge Graph Hypothesis: Which Graph Facts Matter for Scientific Hypothesis Generation?

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Empirical perturbations of local KGs across three LLMs reveal that compact top-k and other subsets often recover most of the hypothesis-generation signal, supporting a compressive KG hypothesis.