Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

REIN: A Comprehensive Benchmark Framework for Data Cleaning Methods in ML Pipelines

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.04702 v1 pith:Z3LBORFP submitted 2023-02-09 cs.DB cs.LG

REIN: A Comprehensive Benchmark Framework for Data Cleaning Methods in ML Pipelines

classification cs.DB cs.LG
keywords datamethodscleaningbenchmarkdiscrepanciesmodelspipelinesapplications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Nowadays, machine learning (ML) plays a vital role in many aspects of our daily life. In essence, building well-performing ML applications requires the provision of high-quality data throughout the entire life-cycle of such applications. Nevertheless, most of the real-world tabular data suffer from different types of discrepancies, such as missing values, outliers, duplicates, pattern violation, and inconsistencies. Such discrepancies typically emerge while collecting, transferring, storing, and/or integrating the data. To deal with these discrepancies, numerous data cleaning methods have been introduced. However, the majority of such methods broadly overlook the requirements imposed by downstream ML models. As a result, the potential of utilizing these data cleaning methods in ML pipelines is predominantly unrevealed. In this work, we introduce a comprehensive benchmark, called REIN1, to thoroughly investigate the impact of data cleaning methods on various ML models. Through the benchmark, we provide answers to important research questions, e.g., where and whether data cleaning is a necessary step in ML pipelines. To this end, the benchmark examines 38 simple and advanced error detection and repair methods. To evaluate these methods, we utilized a wide collection of ML models trained on 14 publicly-available datasets covering different domains and encompassing realistic as well as synthetic error profiles.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Understanding and evaluating computer vision models through the lens of counterfactuals

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    Counterfactual-based methods for concept attribution in classifiers and for dynamic bias evaluation and mitigation in text-to-image models.