Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Metamorphic Testing for Smart Contract Vulnerabilities Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.03179 v1 pith:3GDFPVCS submitted 2023-03-06 cs.SE

Metamorphic Testing for Smart Contract Vulnerabilities Detection

classification cs.SE
keywords smartcontractmetamorphicratetestingvulnerabilitiescontractsapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Despite the rapid growth of smart contracts, they are suffering numerous security vulnerabilities due to the absence of reliable development and testing. In this article, we apply the metamorphic testing technique to detect smart contract vulnerabilities. Based on the anomalies we observed in vulnerable smart contracts, we define five metamorphic relations to detect abnormal gas consumption and account interaction inconsistency of the target smart contract. Through dynamically executing transactions and checking the final violation of metamorphic relations, we determine whether a smart contract is vulnerable. We evaluate our approach on a benchmark of 67 manually annotated smart contracts. The experimental results show that our approach achieves a higher detection rate (TPR, true positive rate) with a lower misreport rate (FDR, false discovery rate) than the other three state-of-the-art tools. These results further suggest that metamorphic testing is a promising method for detecting smart contract vulnerabilities.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ethereum NFT Smart Contracts: Knowledge-Guided Vulnerability Detection with LLM and Code Slicing

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    Code slicing plus a knowledge base raises the LLM's positive-label rate from 73.8% to 97.1% on 450 NFT contracts, an effect not validated against ground truth.