Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Generalizations of Quasilinear MOND (QUMOND)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.01589 v2 pith:QO3IFDA2 submitted 2023-05-02 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph

Generalizations of Quasilinear MOND (QUMOND)

classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
keywords qumondmondtheoriesothersmallersomeconstantsdiffer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

I present a class of theories that generalize quasilinear MOND (QUMOND). Like QUMOND, these GQUMOND theories require solving only the linear Poisson equation (twice). Unlike QUMOND, their Lagrangian depends on higher derivatives of the Newtonian potential. They thus dictate different "phantom" densities as virtual sources in the Poisson equation for the MOND potential. These theories might open new avenues to more fundamental theories, and have much heuristic value. I use them to demonstrate that even within limited classes of modified-gravity formulations of MOND, theories can differ substantially on lower-tier MOND predictions. Such GQUMOND theories force, generically, the introduction of dimensioned constants other than the MOND acceleration, $a_0$, such as a length, a frequency, etc. As a result, some of these theories reduce to QUMOND itself only, e.g., on length scales (or, in other versions, dynamical times) larger than some critical value. But in smaller systems (or, alternatively, in ones with shorter dynamical times), MOND effects are screened, even if their internal accelerations are smaller than $a_0$. In such theories it is possible that MOND (expressed as QUMOND) applies on galactic scales, but its departures from Newtonian dynamics are substantially suppressed in some subgalactic systems -- such as binary stars, and open, or globular star clusters. The same holds for the effect of the galactic field on dynamics in the inner solar system, which can be greatly suppressed compared with what QUMOND predicts. Tidal effects of a galaxy on smaller subsystems are the same as in QUMOND, for the examples I consider. I also describe briefly versions that do not involve dimensioned constants other than $a_0$, and yet differ from QUMOND in important ways.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Improved constraints on modified Newtonian gravity from Cassini radio tracking data

    gr-qc 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0

    An updated Cassini/DE440 fit gives a 40% tighter Solar System quadrupole constraint, producing 3–15 sigma tensions with galaxy rotation curves and a <=2% Milky Way MOND boost.