Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Improving Language Models via Plug-and-Play Retrieval Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.14002 v1 pith:CCRRVYMQ submitted 2023-05-23 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords feedbackretrievalinformationllmsrefeedaddressingenhanceexpensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable performance across various NLP tasks. However, they often generate incorrect or hallucinated information, which hinders their practical applicability in real-world scenarios. Human feedback has been shown to effectively enhance the factuality and quality of generated content, addressing some of these limitations. However, this approach is resource-intensive, involving manual input and supervision, which can be time-consuming and expensive. Moreover, it cannot be provided during inference, further limiting its practical utility in dynamic and interactive applications. In this paper, we introduce ReFeed, a novel pipeline designed to enhance LLMs by providing automatic retrieval feedback in a plug-and-play framework without the need for expensive fine-tuning. ReFeed first generates initial outputs, then utilizes a retrieval model to acquire relevant information from large document collections, and finally incorporates the retrieved information into the in-context demonstration for output refinement, thereby addressing the limitations of LLMs in a more efficient and cost-effective manner. Experiments on four knowledge-intensive benchmark datasets demonstrate our proposed ReFeed could improve over +6.0% under zero-shot setting and +2.5% under few-shot setting, compared to baselines without using retrieval feedback.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Retrieval-Confused Generation is a Good Defender for Privacy Violation Attack of Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A retrieval-confused generation defense that swaps query comments with the most irrelevant paraphrased comments, reducing privacy attack success rates across eight LLMs.

  2. Maximally-Informative Retrieval for State Space Model Generation

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RICO ranks documents by how much they reduce an SSM's question perplexity, using gradient-document inner products, and matches BM25 while often beating E5 on answer quality without finetuning.

  3. Generating Grounded Responses to Counter Misinformation via Learning Efficient Fine-Grained Critiques

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MisMitiFact trains lightweight T5 critique models on fact-checking data to identify errors in numbers, entities, and topics, and uses their short critiques to refine LLM counter-responses at about 5x lower feedback cost.

  4. R4ec: A Reasoning, Reflection, and Refinement Framework for Recommendation Systems

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    R4ec trains a small reflection model to critique and refine LLM-generated user and item knowledge, which then improves downstream recommendation accuracy.

  5. Beyond Independent Passages: Adaptive Passage Combination Retrieval for Retrieval Augmented Open-Domain Question Answering

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AdaPCR jointly retrieves and reranks passage pairs for open-domain QA, showing small EM/F1 gains over an in-context retrieval baseline, mostly on multi-hop HotpotQA.

  6. Building Task Bots with Self-learning for Enhanced Adaptability, Extensibility, and Factuality

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A thesis that combines self-learning from dialog logs, schema-guided prompting, and self-aligned factuality to build task bots with minimal human intervention.

Pith tools