REVIEW 2 cited by
Likelihood-Based Diffusion Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Likelihood-Based Diffusion Language Models
read the original abstract
Despite a growing interest in diffusion-based language models, existing work has not shown that these models can attain nontrivial likelihoods on standard language modeling benchmarks. In this work, we take the first steps towards closing the likelihood gap between autoregressive and diffusion-based language models, with the goal of building and releasing a diffusion model which outperforms a small but widely-known autoregressive model. We pursue this goal through algorithmic improvements, scaling laws, and increased compute. On the algorithmic front, we introduce several methodological improvements for the maximum-likelihood training of diffusion language models. We then study scaling laws for our diffusion models and find compute-optimal training regimes which differ substantially from autoregressive models. Using our methods and scaling analysis, we train and release Plaid 1B, a large diffusion language model which outperforms GPT-2 124M in likelihood on benchmark datasets and generates fluent samples in unconditional and zero-shot control settings.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Continuous Diffusion Models Can Obey Formal Syntax
Training-free gradient guidance, based on the exact regex-acceptance probability under the decoder's unigram distribution, lets continuous diffusion language models satisfy regular-expression constraints.
-
LightningRL: Breaking the Accuracy-Parallelism Trade-off of Block-wise dLLMs via Reinforcement Learning
A GRPO-based post-training method for block-wise diffusion LLMs improves average tokens-per-forward from ~3 to 7.3 while preserving accuracy.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.