Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Vulnerable Source Code Detection using SonarCloud Code Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.02446 v1 pith:VKCNWPOX submitted 2023-07-05 cs.CY cs.CR

Vulnerable Source Code Detection using SonarCloud Code Analysis

classification cs.CY cs.CR
keywords codesoftwarevulnerableapplicationcausescompanydetectionproduct
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC), security vulnerabilities are one of the points introduced during the construction stage. Failure to detect software defects earlier after releasing the product to the market causes higher repair costs for the company. So, it decreases the company's reputation, violates user privacy, and causes an unrepairable issue for the application. The introduction of vulnerability detection enables reducing the number of false alerts to focus the limited testing efforts on potentially vulnerable files. UMKM Masa Kini (UMI) is a Point of Sales application to sell any Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises Product (UMKM). Therefore, in the current work, we analyze the suitability of these metrics to create Machine Learning based software vulnerability detectors for UMI applications. Code is generated using a commercial tool, SonarCloud. Experimental result shows that there are 3,285 vulnerable rules detected.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Large Language Models for Code Generation from Multilingual Prompts: A Curated Benchmark and a Study on Code Quality

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Prompt language affects LLM code generation, but English is not consistently best: Chinese prompts improve Python correctness on CoderEval, while quality and lexicon effects vary by model and programming language.