Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Automated Semiconductor Defect Inspection in Scanning Electron Microscope Images: a Systematic Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.08376 v2 pith:GDCUJKQC submitted 2023-08-16 cs.CV

Automated Semiconductor Defect Inspection in Scanning Electron Microscope Images: a Systematic Review

classification cs.CV
keywords defectinspectionsemiconductordefectsimagesautomatedcomprehensiveelectron
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

A growing need exists for efficient and accurate methods for detecting defects in semiconductor materials and devices. These defects can have a detrimental impact on the efficiency of the manufacturing process, because they cause critical failures and wafer-yield limitations. As nodes and patterns get smaller, even high-resolution imaging techniques such as Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) produce noisy images due to operating close to sensitivity levels and due to varying physical properties of different underlayers or resist materials. This inherent noise is one of the main challenges for defect inspection. One promising approach is the use of machine learning algorithms, which can be trained to accurately classify and locate defects in semiconductor samples. Recently, convolutional neural networks have proved to be particularly useful in this regard. This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the state of automated semiconductor defect inspection on SEM images, including the most recent innovations and developments. 38 publications were selected on this topic, indexed in IEEE Xplore and SPIE databases. For each of these, the application, methodology, dataset, results, limitations and future work were summarized. A comprehensive overview and analysis of their methods is provided. Finally, promising avenues for future work in the field of SEM-based defect inspection are suggested.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. You're Gonna Need a Bigger Core: Calibrating Massive Star Models against Galactic OB-type Stars

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    Galactic OB-star HR-diagram data imply a constant core overshoot α_ov ≈ 0.33 for 12–40 M_sun, yielding larger helium cores than standard prescriptions.

  2. Does Super-Resolution Preserve Defect Evidence? A Low-False-Call Benchmark for Semiconductor Inspection

    cs.CV 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Learned super-resolution improves SSIM but reduces defect-pixel recall under a fixed detector, and clean-calibration feasibility does not transfer to held-out low-false-positive inspection.