REVIEW 1 cited by
OpenAi's GPT4 as coding assistant
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
OpenAi's GPT4 as coding assistant
read the original abstract
Lately, Large Language Models have been widely used in code generation. GPT4 is considered the most potent Large Language Model from Openai. In this paper, we examine GPT3.5 and GPT4 as coding assistants. More specifically, we have constructed appropriate tests to check whether the two systems can a) answer typical questions that can arise during the code development, b) produce reliable code, and c) contribute to code debugging. The test results are impressive. The performance of GPT4 is outstanding and signals an increase in the productivity of programmers and the reorganization of software development procedures based on these new tools.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Using Mutation-Analysis to Examine an LLM's Ability to Summarize Code
Mutation-based testing shows LLM-generated code summaries frequently fail to reflect behavior-changing edits, with accuracy dropping as code complexity rises.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.