Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Revisiting LARS for Large Batch Training Generalization of Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.14053 v5 pith:5FE2RQ4A submitted 2023-09-25 cs.LG cs.AI

Revisiting LARS for Large Batch Training Generalization of Neural Networks

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords larstvlarssharptrainingbatchcasesearlylamb
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper explores Large Batch Training techniques using layer-wise adaptive scaling ratio (LARS) across diverse settings, uncovering insights. LARS algorithms with warm-up tend to be trapped in sharp minimizers early on due to redundant ratio scaling. Additionally, a fixed steep decline in the latter phase restricts deep neural networks from effectively navigating early-phase sharp minimizers. Building on these findings, we propose Time Varying LARS (TVLARS), a novel algorithm that replaces warm-up with a configurable sigmoid-like function for robust training in the initial phase. TVLARS promotes gradient exploration early on, surpassing sharp optimizers and gradually transitioning to LARS for robustness in later phases. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TVLARS consistently outperforms LARS and LAMB in most cases, with up to 2\% improvement in classification scenarios. Notably, in all self-supervised learning cases, TVLARS dominates LARS and LAMB with performance improvements of up to 10\%.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. M+Adam: Low-Precision Training via Additive-Multiplicative Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    M+Adam combines additive and multiplicative update branches, avoiding low-precision rounding stalls and improving LLaMA-style pretraining perplexity compared with AdamW at BF16, FP8, and FP4 master-weight storage.

  2. M+Adam: Low-Precision Training via Additive-Multiplicative Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Combining additive and multiplicative Adam-style updates yields stable BF16/FP8/FP4 master-weight training and lower C4 perplexity than AdamW on 60M–1B LLaMA-style models.