Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Networked Inequality: Preferential Attachment Bias in Graph Neural Network Link Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.17417 v2 pith:T6CU3X3W submitted 2023-09-29 cs.LG cs.CYcs.SI

Networked Inequality: Preferential Attachment Bias in Graph Neural Network Link Prediction

classification cs.LG cs.CYcs.SI
keywords linkpredictionnetworksbiasgraphsocialwithin-groupattachment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph neural network (GNN) link prediction is increasingly deployed in citation, collaboration, and online social networks to recommend academic literature, collaborators, and friends. While prior research has investigated the dyadic fairness of GNN link prediction, the within-group (e.g., queer women) fairness and "rich get richer" dynamics of link prediction remain underexplored. However, these aspects have significant consequences for degree and power imbalances in networks. In this paper, we shed light on how degree bias in networks affects Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) link prediction. In particular, we theoretically uncover that GCNs with a symmetric normalized graph filter have a within-group preferential attachment bias. We validate our theoretical analysis on real-world citation, collaboration, and online social networks. We further bridge GCN's preferential attachment bias with unfairness in link prediction and propose a new within-group fairness metric. This metric quantifies disparities in link prediction scores within social groups, towards combating the amplification of degree and power disparities. Finally, we propose a simple training-time strategy to alleviate within-group unfairness, and we show that it is effective on citation, social, and credit networks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Identifying and Correcting Label Noise for Robust GNNs via Influence Contradiction

    cs.LG 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0

    ICGNN detects noisy node labels with a diffusion-based influence-contradiction score, fits a GMM to split clean from noisy nodes, softly corrects them using neighbor predictions, and adds pseudo-labels for unlabeled nodes.