REVIEW 2 cited by
The Empty Signifier Problem: Towards Clearer Paradigms for Operationalising "Alignment" in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The Empty Signifier Problem: Towards Clearer Paradigms for Operationalising "Alignment" in Large Language Models
read the original abstract
In this paper, we address the concept of "alignment" in large language models (LLMs) through the lens of post-structuralist socio-political theory, specifically examining its parallels to empty signifiers. To establish a shared vocabulary around how abstract concepts of alignment are operationalised in empirical datasets, we propose a framework that demarcates: 1) which dimensions of model behaviour are considered important, then 2) how meanings and definitions are ascribed to these dimensions, and by whom. We situate existing empirical literature and provide guidance on deciding which paradigm to follow. Through this framework, we aim to foster a culture of transparency and critical evaluation, aiding the community in navigating the complexities of aligning LLMs with human populations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
What Do People Actually Want From AI? Mapping Preference Plurality
Open-ended preference data reveals substantial plurality in what people want from AI and divergent interpretations of shared values such as truthfulness.
-
Structural transparency of societal AI alignment through Institutional Logics
Introduces a five-component analytical framework, grounded in Institutional Logics, for making visible the organizational and institutional decisions that shape AI alignment.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.