REVIEW 1 cited by
Quantum Shadow Gradient Descent for Variational Quantum Algorithms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Quantum Shadow Gradient Descent for Variational Quantum Algorithms
read the original abstract
Gradient-based optimizers have been proposed for training variational quantum circuits in settings such as quantum neural networks (QNNs). The task of gradient estimation, however, has proven to be challenging, primarily due to distinctive quantum features such as state collapse and measurement incompatibility. Conventional techniques, such as the parameter-shift rule, necessitate several fresh samples in each iteration to estimate the gradient due to the stochastic nature of state measurement. Owing to state collapse from measurement, the inability to reuse samples in subsequent iterations motivates a crucial inquiry into whether fundamentally more efficient approaches to sample utilization exist. In this paper, we affirm the feasibility of such efficiency enhancements through a novel procedure called quantum shadow gradient descent (QSGD), which uses a single sample per iteration to estimate all components of the gradient. Our approach is based on an adaptation of shadow tomography that significantly enhances sample efficiency. Through detailed theoretical analysis, we show that QSGD has a significantly faster convergence rate than existing methods under locality conditions. We present detailed numerical experiments supporting all of our theoretical claims.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
When cheap gradients fail: the measurement cost of attacking quantum classifiers
Unbiased gradient extraction for attacking quantum classifiers costs at least Θ(d^{5/2}) shots under norm-concentration scaling, and ~d³ for tested deep circuits, so the attacker's relative cost diverges versus classi...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.