Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Instilling Inductive Biases with Subnetworks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.10899 v2 pith:362CIF22 submitted 2023-10-17 cs.LG cs.AI

Instilling Inductive Biases with Subnetworks

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords subtaskbiasesinductiveinductionmodelssolutionsdatademonstrate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the recent success of artificial neural networks on a variety of tasks, we have little knowledge or control over the exact solutions these models implement. Instilling inductive biases -- preferences for some solutions over others -- into these models is one promising path toward understanding and controlling their behavior. Much work has been done to study the inherent inductive biases of models and instill different inductive biases through hand-designed architectures or carefully curated training regimens. In this work, we explore a more mechanistic approach: Subtask Induction. Our method discovers a functional subnetwork that implements a particular subtask within a trained model and uses it to instill inductive biases towards solutions utilizing that subtask. Subtask Induction is flexible and efficient, and we demonstrate its effectiveness with two experiments. First, we show that Subtask Induction significantly reduces the amount of training data required for a model to adopt a specific, generalizable solution to a modular arithmetic task. Second, we demonstrate that Subtask Induction successfully induces a human-like shape bias while increasing data efficiency for convolutional and transformer-based image classification models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Procedural Pretraining: Warming Up Language Models with Abstract Data

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0

    A short warm-up on procedural data (brackets, sorting, sets) makes language models more accurate and more data-efficient on language, code, and informal math.