Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Evaluation of Active Feature Acquisition Methods for Time-varying Feature Settings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.01530 v4 pith:EUACCTH5 submitted 2023-12-03 stat.ML cs.LG

Evaluation of Active Feature Acquisition Methods for Time-varying Feature Settings

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords featureacquisitionassumptionfeatureslearningunderactivemethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning methods often assume that input features are available at no cost. However, in domains like healthcare, where acquiring features could be expensive or harmful, it is necessary to balance a feature's acquisition cost against its predictive value. The task of training an AI agent to decide which features to acquire is called active feature acquisition (AFA). By deploying an AFA agent, we effectively alter the acquisition strategy and trigger a distribution shift. To safely deploy AFA agents under this distribution shift, we present the problem of active feature acquisition performance evaluation (AFAPE). We examine AFAPE under i) a no direct effect (NDE) assumption, stating that acquisitions do not affect the underlying feature values; and ii) a no unobserved confounding (NUC) assumption, stating that retrospective feature acquisition decisions were only based on observed features. We show that one can apply missing data methods under the NDE assumption and offline reinforcement learning under the NUC assumption. When NUC and NDE hold, we propose a novel semi-offline reinforcement learning framework. This framework requires a weaker positivity assumption and introduces three new estimators: A direct method (DM), an inverse probability weighting (IPW), and a double reinforcement learning (DRL) estimator.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. BRiG-AFA: Bellman Risk-to-Go Learning for Non-Myopic Active Feature Acquisition

    cs.LG 2026-08 accept novelty 7.0

    BRiG-AFA learns budget-specific risk-to-go functions via backward Bellman regression and outperforms a one-step ablation at small acquisition budgets in controlled and image benchmarks.

  2. Learning-To-Measure: In-Context Active Feature Acquisition

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    One transformer, pretrained with sequence modeling, greedily acquires features to reduce prediction uncertainty across multiple tasks with missing data, matching or beating task-specific AFA baselines without per-task...