Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Non-convergence to global minimizers for Adam and stochastic gradient descent optimization and constructions of local minimizers in the training of artificial neural networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.05155 v1 pith:DZQUH6C5 submitted 2024-02-07 math.OC cs.LG

Non-convergence to global minimizers for Adam and stochastic gradient descent optimization and constructions of local minimizers in the training of artificial neural networks

classification math.OC cs.LG
keywords methodsminimizerstrainingannsglobaloptimizationproblemadam
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization methods such as the plain vanilla SGD method and the popular Adam optimizer are nowadays the method of choice in the training of artificial neural networks (ANNs). Despite the remarkable success of SGD methods in the ANN training in numerical simulations, it remains in essentially all practical relevant scenarios an open problem to rigorously explain why SGD methods seem to succeed to train ANNs. In particular, in most practically relevant supervised learning problems, it seems that SGD methods do with high probability not converge to global minimizers in the optimization landscape of the ANN training problem. Nevertheless, it remains an open problem of research to disprove the convergence of SGD methods to global minimizers. In this work we solve this research problem in the situation of shallow ANNs with the rectified linear unit (ReLU) and related activations with the standard mean square error loss by disproving in the training of such ANNs that SGD methods (such as the plain vanilla SGD, the momentum SGD, the AdaGrad, the RMSprop, and the Adam optimizers) can find a global minimizer with high probability. Even stronger, we reveal in the training of such ANNs that SGD methods do with high probability fail to converge to global minimizers in the optimization landscape. The findings of this work do, however, not disprove that SGD methods succeed to train ANNs since they do not exclude the possibility that SGD methods find good local minimizers whose risk values are close to the risk values of the global minimizers. In this context, another key contribution of this work is to establish the existence of a hierarchical structure of local minimizers with distinct risk values in the optimization landscape of ANN training problems with ReLU and related activations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Breaking the Curse with BAND: Nonparametric Distribution Estimation in High Dimensions

    stat.ML 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Sparse Bayesian-network factorization plus sparsity-aware regression yields polynomial TV rates for high-dimensional mixed-type distribution estimation, beating classical histogram rates under sparsity.

  2. Landscape analysis for shallow neural networks: Complete classification of critical points for cubic activation and affine target functions

    math.OC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    For cubic-activation shallow networks with affine targets, the squared-loss landscape has no local maxima; every critical point is a global minimizer, a rigid non-global local minimum, or a saddle, and zero loss is ac...