pith. sign in

arxiv: 2403.00236 · v1 · pith:6YRZ3FFNnew · submitted 2024-03-01 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.LG

Benchmarking zero-shot stance detection with FlanT5-XXL: Insights from training data, prompting, and decoding strategies into its near-SoTA performance

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords performancedecodingpromptsstrategieszero-shotdatasetsdetectionflant5-xxl
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We investigate the performance of LLM-based zero-shot stance detection on tweets. Using FlanT5-XXL, an instruction-tuned open-source LLM, with the SemEval 2016 Tasks 6A, 6B, and P-Stance datasets, we study the performance and its variations under different prompts and decoding strategies, as well as the potential biases of the model. We show that the zero-shot approach can match or outperform state-of-the-art benchmarks, including fine-tuned models. We provide various insights into its performance including the sensitivity to instructions and prompts, the decoding strategies, the perplexity of the prompts, and to negations and oppositions present in prompts. Finally, we ensure that the LLM has not been trained on test datasets, and identify a positivity bias which may partially explain the performance differences across decoding strategie

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Zero-shot Tweet-Level Stance Detection Enhanced by External Knowledge and Reflective Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    KIRP framework with knowledge graphs, reflective CoT, stance-aware contrastive learning, and iterative prototype networks achieves SOTA F1 scores on SemEval-2016, WT-WT, and a new Japanese tweet dataset KIRP-D.

  2. The Structure and Dynamics of the Online MAHA-sphere

    cs.SI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Reddit analysis finds MAHA users show strong cross-theme belief bundling and network coherence unlike anti-MAHA users, with pandemic-era shifts from anti-fluoride/mask to anti-vaccine to broader anti-science engagement.